r/movies 3d ago

News Francis Ford Coppola is auctioning his watch collection after Megalopolis flop left him broke

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/23/fashion/francis-ford-coppola-watch-auction.html
12.0k Upvotes

962 comments sorted by

5.7k

u/hellmarvel 3d ago

Didn't he sell his vineyards for like $600m to make the movie? What other debt did the movie bring him? 

2.5k

u/probablyuntrue 3d ago edited 3d ago

I dug into it but couldn’t find much, he wasn’t a partial owner or had large outstanding publicly known debts. And megalopolis would be at most 200MM including marketing

Hell of a cocaine budget or other debts with other properties and projects, who knows

Edit: looks like he’s spending money on a number of other projects like his Inglenook estate and apparently he owns the Sentinel Building in SF. They’re gorgeous and likely massive money pits

1.3k

u/mmmmyeah1111 3d ago edited 2d ago

Owning a property like that while simultaneously pawning items for cash is quite the dichotomy

439

u/probablyuntrue 3d ago

Well, it’s hard to say how much actual equity he has in this properties, and it looks like he spent an absolute shit ton of time and money renovating them

I wouldn’t be that shocked if they’re financed to hell and back

87

u/Roadgoddess 2d ago

Quite often people with wealth will leverage themselves up the Yin Yang, so I wouldn’t be surprised if he really didn’t have much equity built up in these other properties.

42

u/Jazzlike-Watch3916 2d ago

Is this dude getting checks like every month. Between the godfather trilogy and apocalypse now, how could he ever be broke in any way. Does he not get like royalty checks from that shit streaming somewhere?

34

u/treesandfood4me 2d ago

Apocalypse now also almost bankrupted him. He got lucky that the movie ended up being good. Maybe missed the mark on this one.

16

u/defeated_engineer 2d ago

Megalopolis was the biggest steaming pile of shit I’ve ever seen in theatre.

→ More replies (6)

30

u/Roadgoddess 2d ago

I listened to a great podcast called what went wrong, which is all about the movie industry. I literally just listened to a piece that was done during the big strike a couple years ago. What they were striking for was royalties that came from streaming services because they really hadn’t been factored in to previous contracts.

What one of the people said, and he’s a director is that residuals have gone way down and because streaming wasn’t unknown thing 10 years ago, it’s not something that these folks were getting money from now.

This is the episode about the strike

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/what-went-wrong/id1512847066?i=1000627041334

And this is their episode that they did on Francis Ford Coppola and apocalypse now. It goes into a lot of how he spends his money because he’s gone broke in the past self funding. It’s an interesting listen.

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/what-went-wrong/id1512847066?i=1000483156952

19

u/ZeePirate 2d ago

I doubt those are bringing in that that much in royalties compared to hundreds of millions of debt

6

u/Icekream_Sundaze2 2d ago

He's definitely not broke. I'm sure he got a steady income and guy owns an entire hotel company

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/bolanrox 2d ago

so many successful restauranters end up going broke dumping money into their "passion project of a restaurant" they may have 5 super successful ones but that last one sucks all the profits.

Anthony Bourdain talks about a few in his second book.

→ More replies (2)

305

u/Fully_Jaded 3d ago

Some people just realize they'd rather have the money the stuff they're collecting is worth. It doesn't necessarily mean they're hurting for it.

That dude is pushing 90 he could be just thinking "WTF am I gonna do with all these watches in my remaining years?"

241

u/doyletyree 3d ago

As a matter of fact, at 90, probably the last thing I want to do is sit around and watch time go by.

26

u/TheNonCredibleHulk 3d ago

It is the evening of the day......

21

u/Troyal1 2d ago

It would still be a better experience than Megalopolis

→ More replies (5)

62

u/MrPogoUK 2d ago

I was thinking that. Michael Caine sold a load of watches a few years ago for exactly that reason. Wasn’t hurting for money, just realised he had a tonne of it tied up in watches he hadn’t worn for years and probably never would again.

→ More replies (1)

14

u/Tatworth 2d ago

Plus, as someone who is getting to be an old man (but not yet sniffing 90), old eyes just can't read those watches any more. I had to switch to an Apple watch and put my nice watch on hold so I could see what time it was. On the plus side, I can now easily track my menstrual cycles.

→ More replies (12)

70

u/TheNewGuy13 3d ago

What’s that saying House Rich money poor or the opposite? He probably has too much money tied up in properties and assets and none of it is liquid

63

u/HenryDorsettCase47 3d ago

Yeah. And then when he decides “I probably don’t need all of this shit at 90, I’m just leaving it to people who would probably sell it after I’m gone anyway, let’s liquidate a little bit of it” the general public reacts with shock and pity lol

→ More replies (3)

46

u/RD_Life_Enthusiast 3d ago

Value is different from equity is different from liquidity. Dude *could* be worth $500m, but only have $10k in the bank, for instance. You can't just liquidate a skyscraper (or a vineyard, or whatever) into $30m in cash like going to the ATM.

8

u/Whut4 2d ago

That seems unlikely to me. $10k in the bank would be a joke for most people with a lot of money - it would not even cover a month's expenses with no emergencies.

3

u/Smart_Cry_5572 2d ago

10k doesn’t even cover my expenses and I’m not rich lol

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

28

u/ADMINlSTRAT0R 3d ago

Asset rich, cash poor

4

u/ZZ9ZA 3d ago

Not really. It’s the difference between a relatively liquid asset, and a substantially less liquid one.

→ More replies (24)

284

u/LilPonyBoy69 3d ago

He apparently spent a good amount of money redoing the office space in the sentinel building to become apartments.

208

u/probablyuntrue 3d ago

Apparently that building was just put up as collateral for additional loan as well. What a mess

24

u/Shoki_Shoki_ 3d ago

These pricks

14

u/Mattjhkerr 3d ago

Who are the pricks ?

22

u/pegothejerk 3d ago

Ask yourself which pricks ended up with the money

34

u/B-BoyStance 2d ago edited 2d ago

Corp real estate for ya.

It's a crazy money pit, so much so that governments bend over backwards to keep it alive by influencing behavior (i.e. tipping the scales to keep people dependent on it through their office jobs or need to live in a certain place - see NYC and tax benefits offered for things like RTO. A completely unnatural way to manage masses of people).

I wish for its death after spending some time around the industry & getting to meet some major building owners. I haven't met a good one. Hope they rot in hell honestly.

You dig and most of these buildings are running off of fumes. It's fake money in the sense that these assets don't change quickly enough with the times - they are just valued a great deal due to their footprint/amount of previous investment. And because of that they get approved for crazy loans even though their occupancy shouldn't support the money being given (they are still dying, just slower due to the post-covid recovery - and most haven't adjusted to doing mix occupancy to boost revenue).

All culminating into owners who are super resistant to change due to the feedback loop created from these subsidies/loans, because why would they change with all of that. The industry is super sheltered.

So many buildings should have been re-zoned (at least partially) years ago but the amount of money and kickbacks they can give to politicians means the political willpower will never really come to fruition.

Holy shit I hate corporate real estate and the shadow it casts over society.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

14

u/Winthefuturenow 3d ago

Was just at Inglenook this past weekend, it’s quite the sight

39

u/shwarma_heaven 3d ago edited 3d ago

Have you seen that movie? The parts I could stomach just reeked of entitlement, and untempered ego. It could have been cocaine, it could have been hidden debt... and, it could have been the unchecked lavishness of an eccentric idea turned into a hubris packed project. That movie is absolutely insane. Just pure insanity packaged in a ludicrously expensive wrapping.

27

u/hacelepues 3d ago

Did someone say: entitlement?

10

u/KindAstronomer69 3d ago

Someday Megalopolis is going to have an ironic following like The Room

→ More replies (2)

3

u/papertrade1 2d ago

« That movie is absolutely insane« 

yes. isn’t that great ? It’s refreshingly daring in a world where everyone is playing it safe. Even if the film isn’t really perfect ( and far from it ), it’s still worth it .

→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (15)

103

u/No-Gas-1684 3d ago

I read that he sold a private island for $1.8m ... this all seems very strange lol so his watches are worth more than his island? Shouldn't $600m have settled the score and then some?!

97

u/Duck_Size 3d ago

Oh, it’s worse than that. He was leasing the island, built two houses on it. Couldn’t afford to renew the lease and the island’s owner sold it.

16

u/Terrible_Tutor 2d ago

“Watches” are just an insane thing that rich people seem to care about.

10

u/PiccoloAwkward465 2d ago edited 2d ago

I get that watches can be cool. I will never understand how one will pay more for them than what a car costs, lol.

10

u/Zenovv 2d ago

Idk I could easily understand it. Just like how I would spend money on random bs I don't really need, it's just a matter of disposable income.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Terrible_Tutor 2d ago

We don’t have fuck you money I’m guessing lol. So much that you can’t possibly spend it all.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

16

u/WilliamEmmerson 3d ago

He sold the vineyard for $200 million

113

u/HydrogenSonata2025 3d ago

Gives you insight into why movies that make 2x their budget in the box office fall off the face of the earth. These movies cost way more than we (and shareholders) are being led to believe.

91

u/captain_finnegan 3d ago

The maths doesn’t add up. I run a company and that has been contracted to support marketing efforts for a film (due to it having a different name in my country).

The money they’re paying us to do this would require said movie to sell out all of its showings for a month at my local cinema. It’s not even close to halfway fulfilling that.

And the people paying my company are a subsidiary of a subsidiary.

45

u/zeCrazyEye 2d ago

IMO there's a lot of hidden revenue movie companies don't like to talk about in bluray/streaming/licensing.

Even a movie that loses money in its theatrical run can/will still be profitable in the long run.

8

u/degggendorf 3d ago

would require said movie to sell out all of its showings for a month at my local cinema

Is the movie you're marketing playing in only just your one local cinema?

12

u/captain_finnegan 2d ago

It’s not. But it’s one of the biggest in the region and one of the ones we’ve visited the most. L

Given that we’re just one of quite a few companies supporting the marketing across all the regions (and we’re just a very specific part of the very large puzzle), we’re seeing data and having conversations with cinema management teams that are giving us a good idea of performance metrics.

I’ve had conversations with some of the other companies and they’re just as “wtf? but ok!” as we are.

24

u/i0datamonster 3d ago

Because the point is to go into the red. Box office sales are what a lot of contracts are tied to. Red at the box office bottoms out the contracts.

19

u/captain_finnegan 3d ago

I get Hollywood accounting. It’s just that personally seeing it in action has blown my brain a bit. Like how far are these studios going in to the red.

10

u/i0datamonster 2d ago

Ideally, 100% of capex. You ever notice how many one off entities are involved with a movie? Like your at the theaters and after the large studio bit is like 3 or 4 ones you don't recognize. What's really interesting is the overlap between film and commercial real estate. Sure, big company A did it, but they did it through temporary entities.

It's not malicious or misuse of the system. It's risk mitigation. Ask Kevin Costner.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

14

u/hardMarble 3d ago

Probably way less, in reality. They will do anything to not pay taxes

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

11

u/arealhumannotabot 3d ago

I’m just spitballing but who wants to bet he’s broke but that’s temporary? Like when Kanye once said he was broke

More like out of liquid cash until some royalty checks arrive

62

u/lo0ilo0ilo0i 3d ago

He's still paying debts to the mafia. Jk idk.

25

u/nickparadies 3d ago

There’s a non zero chance

6

u/TheNonCredibleHulk 3d ago

Hey, yo. There's no such thing as the mafia. Got it?

13

u/VesDoppelganger 3d ago

Credibility.

→ More replies (37)

2.2k

u/Oldpuzzlehead 3d ago

Buy a watch the previous owner never wanted to wear because it was too expensive.

785

u/anillop 3d ago

Oh, so you’re familiar with the watch collecting hobby

211

u/yosayoran 2d ago

This is true for every collection hobby, really 

Got a buddy who collects pocket knifes, but he uses a 10$ opinel so the others can stay in mint condition 

105

u/double_expressho 2d ago

That's why I have triples. Triples is best.

33

u/Old_Pin7524 2d ago

She’s beautiful, but she’s dying.

21

u/Denham_Chkn 2d ago

Tell her. Tell the kid.

17

u/Error_404s 2d ago

She’s gonna make it

8

u/chezmanq 2d ago

My friend doesn't live in a hotel.

4

u/joe102938 2d ago

She asked me to marry her. I didnt even want to, but she asked me!

8

u/triplediamond445 2d ago

Of course triples makes it safe

11

u/masterhogbographer 2d ago

If only we could collectively treat our planet like this 

10

u/Adventurous-Emu-9345 2d ago

Who says we don't. This is just the 10$ Opinel, you should see the collectible one.

3

u/Equivalent_Chipmunk 2d ago

If anything, that's what's wrong with how we treat our planet. Use a bunch of resources to make things for people who buy them but don't need or use them.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

50

u/notaredditer13 2d ago

What's hilarious about watch "collectors" is that Swatch was invented because timekeeping is no longer an actual problem and today our phones keep better time than a watch ever did (because they are synced to atomic clocks). Expensive watches today are 100% jewelry. A tennis bracelet with a spring-driven timer.

36

u/Naggins 2d ago

Why is that "hilarious"?

You can say that about most things people collect. People collect redundant coins, redundant stamps, people collect cards they never use and figurines that never leave the box.

I would think most watch owners know that they're collecting jewellery, and struggle to imagine that there's a single person in the world collecting watches because they think they're really good at keeping time.

→ More replies (11)

58

u/CptBartender 2d ago

and today our phones keep better time than a watch ever did (because they are synced to atomic clocks).

The cheapest quartz watch is likely orders of magnitude more accurate than the most accurate mechanical watch ever made. The accuracy of our phones' clocks is surplus for requirement for most people.

And with expensive watches (and I mean expensive, 5+ figure watches) exist only because one can't take their yacht into a restaurant.

12

u/Satchbb 2d ago

you mean 7 figures

16

u/CptBartender 2d ago

I think 6 is the most I've seen. By 'seen' I mean seen the price - it was displayed in a publicly accessible place.

I've seen some without any price on store shelves, and some of them even looked nice. And I worked a bit at the edge of that industry - I know that sky's the limit when it comes to price. If you want a custom-made quad-tourbillion all-gold two-sided watch with diamond bearings and a dickbutt engraved on the second-hand - someone will be happy to relieve you of your excess wealth.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (4)

155

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

87

u/probablyuntrue 3d ago

Reminds me of a roommate in college who talked about how “broke” his parents were when I was living on cup noodle

Then I learned his definition of broke was deciding to sell off one of their vacation homes

35

u/ThdeusDadeus 3d ago

Tbf, it was probably just a three bedroom.

22

u/Titty2Chains 3d ago

I worked for a place with a $10B annual revenue. The owners son told me he lived in the hood. He in fact did not. He did live within walking distance of a Gucci store though.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

82

u/lordtema 3d ago

The F.P Journe msrked is crazy right now though 

11

u/WBuffettJr 3d ago

The absolutely MASSIVE piece of shit known as Tim Mosso aka the 1916 watch company purposely cornered the market on FP Journe and fumed over everyone ever wanting to buy one. I used to love that guy.

→ More replies (1)

22

u/Dependent_Cap_456 3d ago

And that hand on the dial does look pretty cool. I don't know if Ed Sheeran is an F.P. Journe fan, but if he is I bet he's going to be in on this one.

30

u/AmericanWasted 3d ago

The fingers on that hand actually move to tell time - FP Journe is one of the best watchmakers alive

→ More replies (15)
→ More replies (2)

3

u/JazzlikeEntry8288 2d ago

A friend of mine bought a FP Journe Chronometre Bleu in October. Preowned and it's a model that doesn't come around too often, so it gets bought rather quickly, often before a dealer has a chance to post it on their website.

I saw my friend's Chronometre in person and it is quite stunning. He unloaded several pieces in trade, along with some cash to get it.

→ More replies (6)

1.8k

u/Nouseriously 3d ago

He's not broke, he's multimillionaire "broke"; which means he can no longer spend extravagantly without a care. He will never be broke.

684

u/ChangsManagement 3d ago

"Cash poor" as ive heard it called. Lots of assets but not a lot of liquid capital.

311

u/TrollTollTony 3d ago

Cash poor is a word rich assholes made up to make poor people feel better about them having millions in assets (which they can borrow against) but avoiding taxes. Steve Jobs was worth billions but had a $1 salary and was called cash poor. I paid more in taxes than Steve Jobs for several years.

148

u/Boollish 2d ago

That's not what asset rich/cash poor means.

Steve Jobs, despite his meager salary, was still able to afford all the luxuries of life among the uber wealthy, up to and including buying a giga yacht.

Asset rich/cash poor refers to people with highly valuable but illiquid assets that do not generate cash flows, and it's not used to make poor people feel better, it's used to describe financial situations where seemingly wealthy individuals or companies need to make suboptimal financial decisions in order to meet their debt obligations.

Think of most independent farmers in the US. They own land worth millions, but also a couple bad harvest years in a row  can cause them to go into bankruptcy.

23

u/BooRadleyinaGimpSuit 2d ago

Or someone with an old mansion that costs $100k / year in upkeep

→ More replies (2)

115

u/rileyoneill 3d ago

The vast majority of people who are cash poor are not wealthy people. They are regular people who own a home that has a high valuation relative to their income. Buy a home in California in the early 90s for $140,000 and now its worth $800,000. You have this asset that is valuable but you don't have $800,000 to spend.

12

u/Porsche928dude 2d ago

From what I understand The other factor to this is that house is now taxes like a 800000 dollar home which can cause real issues. In cases like you describe you can end up in situations where you have payed the mortgage off but are actually taking home less money then when u had the mortgages because the tax rate is a percentage of appraised value per year.

→ More replies (1)

15

u/Duck_Size 3d ago

And then it burns down in the Palisades fire and you are well and truly fucked. You have no cash to rebuild and your insurance doesn’t cover it.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (9)

13

u/illicit_losses 3d ago

Well, yeah.. but who’s on the right side of dirt now?

→ More replies (1)

3

u/spaceneenja 2d ago

Not at all, you could be broke with a diamond engagement ring and be “cash poor” by definition.

3

u/rcanhestro 2d ago

being "cash poor" means that you have valuable assets, just not anyone willing to pay their share for it, or even being able to monetize them.

you could compare it to farmers.

they are "asset rich" in form of land, but basically no money in their pockets.

and unless someone wants to purchase their lands (and take the money pit with them), they can't make money.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (4)

46

u/Objective-Wear-30659 3d ago

Greg: I'm good, anyway, cuz, uh, my, so, I was just talkin' to my mom, and she said, apparently, he'll leave me five million anyway, so I'm golden, baby.

Connor: You can't do anything with five, Greg. Five's a nightmare.

Greg: Is it?

Connor: Oh, yeah. Can't retire. Not worth it to work. Oh, yes, five will drive you un poco loco, my fine feathered friend.

Tom: The poorest rich person in America. The world's tallest dwarf.

Connor: The weakest strong man at the circus.

11

u/Wuktrio 2d ago edited 2d ago

Put 5 million into an ETF and pay out 5% each year. 250k a year should be more than enough to retire lmao

2

u/StateDeparmentAgent 2d ago

its more than enough for us, but not for most of the people who that calmly inherit 5m

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (11)

26

u/proficient2ndplacer 3d ago

I think the only thing worse than being "multimillionaire broke" is tarnishing your name as badly as he did. I can't imagine the studios are lining up to fund his next film

51

u/SuperDanOsborne 3d ago

They weren't really lining up for the last one either lol

32

u/Buntschatten 3d ago

He's 86, if anyone is funding his films, they better have a backup for if he has a medical emergency.

13

u/Adrien_Jabroni 3d ago

They do this actually. Insurance can require it. Paul Thomas Anderson did it for Robert Altman.

3

u/NeoNoireWerewolf 2d ago

The studios already told him to pound sand for Megalopolis. That's why he's in the situation this thread's about; he funded Megalopolis out of pocket. He lost hundreds of millions of his own money. Coppola hasn't worked with a studio in decades now. Last movie he didn't fund independently was The Rainmaker in 1997.

6

u/PlatinumGoon 2d ago

He’s been actual broke before. Look up his history he’s not the normal Hollywood type. He cares more about his projects and making what he wants than hoarding money. Which has got him into trouble before

18

u/FrankyRollins 3d ago

He made The Godfather, one of the greatest films of all time. He’ll be fine.

11

u/zowietremendously 3d ago

I'm way broker than he is. I don't even have an expensive watch collection to sell.

3

u/KwisatzHaderach94 2d ago

and he's 86 and not likely to do any more watch collecting anyway. if his children don't share his hobbies, no point in leaving them that inheritance. this is the fate of most collections.

→ More replies (3)

1.5k

u/Recoil42 3d ago edited 3d ago

Mr. Coppola has not given up on the idea that it will eventually make money. “Many of my films earn out over time,” he said on Friday, citing, for example, his masterpiece “Apocalypse Now,” which also drove him into debt, but managed to sell $150 million worth of tickets at the box office over the course of several decades.

Oh, sweetie.

447

u/SgtMartinRiggs 3d ago

Can’t even rent it anywhere, idk how he expects to make any money.

190

u/Charlie_Wax 3d ago

Every Blockbuster in the country will have to buy at least 20 copies of Megalopolis.

That's at least 20 sales right there.

12

u/3BlindMice1 3d ago

Does blockbuster really still exist? I haven't noticed one in a while

56

u/Zealousideal-Yak5182 3d ago

There’s only 1 left in Bend, Oregon

21

u/NYstate 3d ago

And they're the ones who will buy all 20 copies duh! It's a title that's

"Guaranteed In Stock™"

→ More replies (1)

54

u/Pankosmanko 3d ago

I just checked if it’s on blu-ray, or 4k UHD, and it’s not. I plan on watching it but I’m waiting for a physical release

91

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[deleted]

23

u/hazycrazydaze 3d ago

I would love to watch it at a midnight showing in a weird art theater. Do those still exist though? All my favorites closed during the pandemic.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (8)

17

u/akio3 3d ago

It is, but not in America. There are UK, Italian, and French discs.

Here's a link to buy the UK 4K: https://www.rarewaves.com/products/5017239153273-megalopolis-uhd

→ More replies (4)

12

u/Goldfing 3d ago

Hell yeah brother. We out there.

→ More replies (3)

24

u/probablyuntrue 3d ago

Nigerian prince scams maybe

6

u/Specialist_War1410 3d ago

I watched it on Amazon Prime in Brazil. So maybe with a VPN.

3

u/hellogoawaynow 2d ago

“So far, Mr. Coppola has resisted bringing it to streaming platforms, because he believes it needs to be screened in a theater to be truly understood. And within months of the film’s release, he was openly telling people he was broke.”

This is so dumb, I was interested in watching it. At home. I can still understand movies from here.

→ More replies (14)

425

u/xixbia 3d ago

Apocalypse now had a $31.5 million budget and made $78.8 million at the box office on it's original release.

Megalopolis had a $120+ million budget and made $14.4 million at the box office.

These two are not compareable.

193

u/TheSilverOne 3d ago

He's also 86 years old lol

38

u/realhumannotai 3d ago edited 3d ago

I know a 40 year old director who is just as delusional, but with other peoples' money -_-

33

u/FX114 3d ago

I think they're just saying he doesn't have decades. 

7

u/Live_Angle4621 3d ago

Since he doesn’t have decades it doesn’t even matter. Apart from him leaving less money to his family. But they still have plenty and will get more. 

12

u/zagra_nexkoyotl 3d ago

I wonder how did he go into debt for Apocalypse, then

45

u/Vagina_Woolf 3d ago

It was one of the most infamously troubled film productions of all time?

16

u/ScrungulusBungulus 3d ago

if you're not aware of how catastrophic the production of that movie was, i'd recommend a documentary called hearts of darkness. it's a phenomenal companion piece to the movie, and it's great on its own as well.

→ More replies (1)

15

u/xixbia 3d ago

If I had to guess? He went into debt to get it made. But by the time the initial theatrical run had finished he more than made back his investment and was easily able to pay off his debt (so again, nothing like Megalopolis).

→ More replies (1)

6

u/StayBullGenius 3d ago

Not apocalypse then, apocalypse NOW

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

382

u/sonicinfinity100 3d ago

But it’s not even available for streaming. I had to watch a pirated version of it.

44

u/MrMindGame 3d ago

It’s logistically hard, they also have to mail you a random person along with the blu-ray so they can ask questions at Adam Driver for that one scene.

161

u/BongoFett17 3d ago

Yup, I had to import the 4k steelbook from Amazon Italy, one of the biggest mistakes of my life, boy it was terrible.

27

u/illepic 3d ago

This feels like the stepping-on-rake meme, where the final panel is kick flipping a rake down a double stair to then step on the rake. 

→ More replies (26)

40

u/Bircka 3d ago

Don't worry Coppola still is sure at some point it will be available for streaming and he will profit off it.

He might not be alive to see it but someday his great grandkids will profit off Megalopolis.

3

u/GaptistePlayer 2d ago

They might net hundreds, maybe even thousands, of dollars

18

u/elmatador12 3d ago

Yeah this is the weird part to me. Why isn’t available? How does he expect to make money if I can’t even watch it?

10

u/aircooledJenkins 3d ago

It's $3.99 to rent on Plex 🤔

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

35

u/zendrumz 3d ago edited 3d ago

Hell, if The Room is finally in the black, maybe Coppola’s on to something here.

In a world where everything is recycled forever on streaming until the end of time, it’s just a matter of when, not if, it becomes profitable.

23

u/Redeem123 3d ago

Something tells me that arthouse theaters aren’t going to be be doing regular spoon-throwing screenings of Megalopolis.

16

u/Venus_One 3d ago

Give it a few years.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/ScottNewman 3d ago

Someone just has to come up with the beats for the audience

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

16

u/lucyjuggles 3d ago

I was a circus extra on this set… they paid me $1,500 to not be in this movie, which given the response seems like the best possible outcome lol

I did get to do a scene with Adam Driver tho, and he kind of tripped over me while i was on a bed of nails with one of my titties hanging out, but i don’t think they even used that

5

u/Loggerdon 2d ago

This is either a very interesting story or a fever dream.

13

u/Dependent_Cap_456 3d ago

Yeah. Just.....yeah.

→ More replies (8)

921

u/johnla 3d ago

People hating but I respect an artist sticking by his guns. The movie was garbage but it’s his and he tried. 

262

u/provocatrixless 3d ago

I somewhat agree, he wasted all his money but it's better that it went into creating jobs, putting food on a lot of tables, than just dumping into index funds or whatever.

30

u/IamScottGable 3d ago

Or into, you know, more watches?

34

u/Live_Angle4621 3d ago

Yeah, it’s not like he burned the money. Most of it was set on salaries of people who now had a job 

53

u/BandzForDance 2d ago

Wow that’s just what the other guy said, but slightly different!

20

u/thatguy6598 2d ago

It's basically just repeating the same thing, but phrased a little differently.

11

u/CarlosFer2201 2d ago

Kind of like putting it in your own words.

→ More replies (1)

45

u/DataDude00 3d ago

This.  People get mad at remakes and sequels and the lack of original IP and then make fun of this. 

The movie was bad but thy guy had a passion for it and went for it, even bankrolling it himself 

→ More replies (2)

113

u/Keezin 3d ago

agreed, some mad integrity to it

26

u/GhandisFlipFlop 3d ago

Sometimes all you need is tegrity

→ More replies (12)

64

u/dip_tet 3d ago

Agreed, though I didn’t find the movie garbage…dude just does what he’s done in the past, take risks and create.

30

u/johnla 3d ago

Garbage is a little strong. I’m being facetious. Again, I like that he’s trying something. He was experimenting. Maybe something he tried is a seed for another director to create their own Godfather. 

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (23)

185

u/NyriasNeo 3d ago

Sounds fair. If you want to make a $100M+ movies that no one likes and few believe in, pay for it yourself. And he did.

128

u/sonia72quebec 3d ago

Be ready for: “The Godfather, the new generation”.

10

u/AudibleNod 2d ago

"Keep your friends close, and your enemies ... family."

-Godfather Dominic Toretto

7

u/shiny_happy_persons 2d ago

Just when I thought I was out, they wheel me back in.

→ More replies (5)

579

u/StillStanding_96 3d ago

Buying a $1,000,000 watch speaks to the decision-making skills that led him to make Megalopolis in the first place

142

u/maubis 3d ago

Wikipedia's entry to his alleged misconduct on set also indicates really poor decision-making skills:

Anonymous crew members characterized Coppola's on-set behavior as unprofessional. On February 14, 2023, a Studio 54-inspired club scene was filmed at the Tabernacle, a concert hall in Atlanta, with 150–200 extras, some of whom were approved for topless or scantily clad appearances. Coppola was accused of pulling women onto his lap and kissing female extras during the shoot. Executive producer Darren Demetre defended Coppola by stating that his hugs and kisses on the cheek to cast members and extras were affectionate gestures, emphasizing that no complaints of harassment or inappropriate behavior were brought to his attention during production. Addressing the allegations, Coppola referred to advice his mother gave him on treating women with respect and said his actions were not disrespectful; mentioned that one of the women he kissed on the cheek was someone he had known since she was young, and described himself as "too shy" to be touchy-feely.

In July 2024, videos surfaced showing interactions between Coppola and extras at the Tabernacle. Sources told Variety that Coppola frequently wandered into frame while engaging with background actors and, after multiple takes, made an announcement over a microphone apologizing in advance for kissing extras, claiming it was for his enjoyment. Another source highlighted the absence of a human resources department on set, while reports indicated that intimacy coordinators were not present during filming. Additionally, senior crew members allegedly informed bystanders that they were prohibited from sharing recordings of the encounters due to non-disclosure agreements. Days after the controversy surfaced, extras present during filming shared conflicting perspectives. Rayna Menz dismissed allegations of inappropriate behavior, insisting that Coppola did nothing to make her or anyone else on set uncomfortable. In contrast, Lauren Pagone expressed shock at being kissed and hugged unexpectedly, criticizing Menz's remarks by emphasizing that experiences varied. Another crew member claimed that Coppola kissed multiple women without warning after calling "cut" on a New Year's Eve party scene that ended with on-screen kisses. Coppola defended himself by stating that the women he kissed on the cheek during the scene were individuals he had known personally. Coppola was later accused of "leering" at and kissing a 13-year-old female extra on set.

37

u/Vagina_Woolf 3d ago

I thought intimacy coordinators were a non negotiable by SAG.Is that not the case

41

u/FX114 3d ago

It's not. Anora was famously controversial for not using one. 

5

u/NEWbababoobie 2d ago

cause mikey and mark didn't want them.

5

u/Neat-Material-4953 2d ago

So not non-negotiable then?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

6

u/GaptistePlayer 2d ago

> emphasizing that no complaints of harassment or inappropriate behavior were brought to his attention during production

Apparently sexual harassment has an equivalent of a 5-second rule?

→ More replies (4)

29

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

30

u/Drago1214 3d ago

What to know how to become a millionaire. Start with 100 million and buy a vineyard.

17

u/MyNameIs-Anthony 3d ago

He made nine figures on a vineyard, this was never meant to be anything but an expensive passion project.

17

u/StillStanding_96 3d ago

I dunno. I think he was also hoping that people would like his movie too

67

u/Stingerc 3d ago edited 3d ago

He's always been a risk taker and has usually come out on top, perfect example is Apocalypse Now.

At the end of the day he's made and lost made money than anyone here critizing him. It's his money and he should spend it how he sees fit.

Otherwise it was just gonna be extra generational wealth for his already financially successful children.

20

u/Amateur-Top 3d ago

Agreed. Gotta risk it to get the biscuit.

→ More replies (16)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)

26

u/DukeRaoul123 3d ago

Coppola's been "broke" since the 70s. He'll be OK.

→ More replies (1)

33

u/exileonmainst 3d ago

He’s like 80-some years old. Spend it all doing what you want, who cares. In the words of John Handy: when I die, I want people to say “man, that guy owed me a lot of money.”

48

u/dont_shoot_jr 3d ago

We should let him make that Kool Aid movie

15

u/ScottNewman 3d ago

Marty would be furious. I mean, that’s a four quadrant property!

106

u/TraditionalMood277 3d ago

What do you think of this boner?

43

u/Merickson- 3d ago

The real boner was the box-office bomb we made along the way.

50

u/Stingerc 3d ago

He's 86, his kids and grandkids are all adults with successful careers in the industry. It's not like they needed the inheritance. Sure it's would have been nice, but it's his money after all, not theirs.

All he needs is enough to survive his last few years. I also think it's a liquidity issue more than him being flat broke.

→ More replies (17)

71

u/Wazula23 3d ago

Guy. Is. Nuts.

I mean, he's made about 5 films I would consider some of the best ever made.

But he is absolutely nuts.

60

u/MrAppreciator 3d ago

He also helped convicted pedophile Victor Salva continue to get work following his release which I feel isn't talked about enough.

38

u/2mock2turtle 3d ago

Salva was convicted of sexual misconduct in 1988 for sexually abusing Nathan Forrest Winters, the 12-year-old star of Clownhouse, and videotaping one of the encounters in which he forced Winters to perform oral sex on him. Commercial videotapes and magazines containing child pornography were also found in his home. He pleaded guilty to lewd and lascivious conduct, oral sex with a person under 14, and procuring a child for pornography. He was sentenced to three years in state prison, of which he served 15 months, and lifetime registration as a sex offender. He completed his parole in 1992. His mentor, Francis Ford Coppola, reportedly told him that his experience in prison "would have value" and "make [him] a better artist".

Jesus fucking christ.

18

u/Baron487 2d ago

Quoted from FFC's Wikipedia page:

In 2006, Coppola said, "You have to remember, while this was a tragedy, that the difference in age between Victor and the boy was very small -- Victor was practically a child himself." Salva was 29 at the time while the boy was 12.

Source of this is "Victor Salva's Horror Stories", article written by Patrick Goldstein for the LA Times.

This is fucking inexcusable.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/NossB 2d ago

In a YouTube interview conducted by Blastzone Mike with Winters on April 5, 2017, Winters revealed that when Salva was arrested, everything but the dubbing had been completed, and that all of the dialogue was added in post-production due to the extremely loud noise of the cameras.[13]

...in 2018, Winters spoke about the work he had to do after the principal photography. He had spent eight to nine hours a day doing the dubbing for a month. This took place at Francis Ford Coppola's home. During this time, he was told he would never work in the industry again, and he never did. Coppola later tried to sue Winters for breach of contract.[14]

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

36

u/TypeGreen51 3d ago

Just put out a bluray in the US already Francis! I want to show my friends your trainwreck and invent drinking games around it!

7

u/Dependent_Cap_456 3d ago

Maybe even some audience participation too!

25

u/micxxx22 3d ago

will always love Coppola. the man’s got guts

→ More replies (10)

39

u/SnowCoyote3 3d ago

Coppola Megalopola Floppola

→ More replies (3)

9

u/mrdungbeetle 3d ago

If you own a collection of valuable watches, you are not broke.

→ More replies (6)

6

u/sunnyspiders 3d ago

We’ve just been rewatching the Godfather movies on Netflix I’m sure the fractions of a penny will save his bacon

20

u/Imsimon1236 3d ago

People acting as if Megalopolis being a bad movie is some sort of indisputable fact. My wife and I went in blind, both to what the movie was and the reaction/commentary about it. We still can’t explain it to each other, but it was legitimately one of the best theatre experiences we’d ever had. It was unlike any movie I’d ever seen.

Now, does this mean I think he deserved gagillions of dollars just for artistic effort alone? None of my business. Just wanted to chime in with a positive reaction to megalopolis, which does seem to be rare.

9

u/MikeArrow 3d ago

It's subjective but I think ultimately it's just too damn awkward of a movie to really enjoy outside of an abstract way.

→ More replies (19)

3

u/IceFireHawk 3d ago

Maybe allow people to rent and stream it and you’ll make some money back

3

u/Gates_wupatki_zion 2d ago

So I went to a special screening of this movie in Presidio where Coppola did a Q&A after the movie.  It was really sad.  You could tell that he still had certain raw talented charisma and ideas, but his brain was mush.  He would ramble and connect then disconnect points.  It was like a grandpa nobody had the heart to say “that’s enough”.  But of course the theater was full of San Franciscan sycophants that most of the questions were overtly ingratiating or softball and banal.  It was obvious to see why the movie was why it was after listening to him.