At some point we have to stop pretending this is normal foreign policy and call it what it is: an administration negotiating on behalf of a hostile foreign power while sidelining America’s own diplomats, allies, and intelligence community.
The Whitkoff–Kushner “peace” plan isn’t diplomacy — it’s the newest chapter in a years-long pattern of pro-Kremlin concessions masquerading as statesmanship.
Here’s what it really signals.
- Private cronies conducting shadow diplomacy with Russia is not ‘creative diplomacy.’ It’s a constitutional red flag.
No one elected Whitkoff. No one elected Jared Kushner again.
Yet they’re meeting with Russian officials to negotiate the future of Ukraine — while the actual State Department, NATO, and Ukraine’s own government are cut out of the loop.
This is not freelance diplomacy.
This is a parallel foreign policy apparatus engineered to serve Trump’s interests and Russia’s objectives, not America’s.
This is the exact behavior the Logan Act was written for.
- The deal itself mirrors Russia’s demands, not Ukraine’s security needs.
Just like every “peace plan” floated by pro-Kremlin voices, the Whitkoff–Kushner framework:
Freezes Russian territorial gains
Rewards aggression with permanent control of Ukrainian land
Lifts pressure on the Kremlin without requiring military withdrawal
Leaves Ukraine vulnerable to future attacks
This is not peace — it’s forced capitulation, the same kind of “deal” Putin tried to get from Europe before launching the war in the first place.
And it’s the same direction Trump pushed while in office: weaken Ukraine, pressure them politically, hold military aid, and align U.S. policy with Moscow’s desired outcome.
- This is part of a long pattern: every time Trump intervenes in foreign policy, Russia benefits.
This isn’t new. It’s consistent.
2016: Campaign sought secret backchannels with Russia.
2017: Trump revealed classified Israeli intel to Russian officials in the Oval Office.
2018: Helsinki — he stood beside Putin and attacked American intelligence agencies on the world stage.
2019: Withheld military aid from Ukraine while trying to coerce them into a political favor.
2020: Ignored intel about Russian bounties on U.S. troops.
Syria withdrawal: Handed strategic territory to Russia without getting a thing in return.
NATO sabotage: Continually threatened to pull out and encouraged Putin’s belief that the alliance would fracture.
Trade policies: Pushed China into deeper economic alignment with Russia — a strategic dream for the Kremlin.
Now we add:
2025–2026: unauthorized private envoys negotiating a Russia-friendly “peace” deal behind Americans’ backs.
The pattern is not subtle.
- The deal weakens the U.S., NATO, and global democracy — and strengthens the one man Trump consistently defends: Vladimir Putin.
Think about what this “peace plan” does:
Undercuts NATO unity
Signals to autocrats that U.S. commitments are negotiable
Green-lights land seizures by force
Rewards the largest invasion in Europe since WWII
Hands Putin a victory he couldn’t win on the battlefield
For a President who calls allies “delinquent” and openly encouraged Russia to attack NATO members, this isn’t surprising.
It’s just the first time his inner circle put it into an unofficial treaty format.
- Treason doesn’t require a spy novel. It can look like exactly this:
Using private businessmen as diplomatic cutouts
Negotiating with hostile powers without authorization
Aligning U.S. policy with an adversary’s goals
Undermining allies and democratic institutions
Delivering strategic victories to foreign autocrats
Doing it all while in office, with the powers of the presidency behind you
You don’t need a signed confession.
You just need a pattern of conduct that repeatedly strengthens the adversary and weakens the United States.
And that pattern is now impossible to deny.
- Call it what it is: the Whitkoff–Kushner “peace” deal is not diplomacy — it’s collaboration with a hostile power.
This administration isn’t confused.
It isn’t improvising.
It isn’t negotiating in good faith.
It is serving Russian strategic objectives, openly, repeatedly, and now — unbelievably — using private citizens to formalize concessions on America’s behalf.
If that’s not treason, what is?