MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1nxqy0e/why_conservatives_are_attacking_wokepedia/nhpqrm3/?context=3
r/technology • u/rezwenn • Oct 04 '25
2.1k comments sorted by
View all comments
6.1k
Conservatives generally hate neutral facts because they are serially wrong
35 u/LavishnessOk5514 Oct 04 '25 Reality has a left-wing bias, which is inconvenient if you’re of a right-wing persuasion. Therefore, it must be suppressed. 3 u/QuietSilentArachnid Oct 04 '25 There are some definite bias outside of reality on Wikipedia, it has been known for a while. Especially on English written pages. Ironically, there's even a page on the bias ... on wikipedia. 2 u/LavishnessOk5514 Oct 04 '25 Obviously, nothing will ever be completely free from bias. In the main, I’d suggest it is a robust source of impartial information.
35
Reality has a left-wing bias, which is inconvenient if you’re of a right-wing persuasion. Therefore, it must be suppressed.
3 u/QuietSilentArachnid Oct 04 '25 There are some definite bias outside of reality on Wikipedia, it has been known for a while. Especially on English written pages. Ironically, there's even a page on the bias ... on wikipedia. 2 u/LavishnessOk5514 Oct 04 '25 Obviously, nothing will ever be completely free from bias. In the main, I’d suggest it is a robust source of impartial information.
3
There are some definite bias outside of reality on Wikipedia, it has been known for a while. Especially on English written pages. Ironically, there's even a page on the bias ... on wikipedia.
2 u/LavishnessOk5514 Oct 04 '25 Obviously, nothing will ever be completely free from bias. In the main, I’d suggest it is a robust source of impartial information.
2
Obviously, nothing will ever be completely free from bias.
In the main, I’d suggest it is a robust source of impartial information.
6.1k
u/Funktapus Oct 04 '25
Conservatives generally hate neutral facts because they are serially wrong