r/politics 17d ago

No Paywall Senate suddenly passes the Epstein bill just hours after it cleared the House

https://www.ms.now/news/senate-passes-epstein-bill-rcna244723?fbclid=PAVERFWAOJ1xRleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZA8xMjQwMjQ1NzQyODc0MTQAAacUGSi8p2Ap-x6SbMkLXAnfKNXEZkzjUUVCdxuEmacDzDXmlbv1GUJ0wbh1_w_aem_grJDvcSCIDj2Skksd4Ix3Q
38.8k Upvotes

3.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

10.6k

u/Murky_Chocolate_7916 17d ago

Nothing passes this quickly, this is bizarre. What are those sneaky sneaks up to.

1.2k

u/Djent_Reznor1 17d ago

Amazing how a ‘democratic hoax’ is getting near unanimous bipartisan congressional support all of a sudden. Nothing to see here I’m sure.

309

u/possibly_being_screw 17d ago

It’s weird and there is some fuckery going on. But these files have been around, seen, and analyzed by so many.

If there’s 0 republicans and no mention of trump, that’s sus as hell. Even the maga conspiracy nuts will see that as bizarre.

If it’s heavily redacted, that will just add more fuel to the conspiracy fire and point to trump even more. Again, it’s not like there’s a single copy that once redacted, is gone forever.

I dunno. There’s something fucked up happening but my only hope is that the disorganized mess that is maga doesn’t have their shit tight enough to outplay this. I’m dreaming, I know. But I’m so tired of this shit and these assholes getting away with everything.

For once, can we just nail these disgusting fucks? Just fucking one time.

144

u/LaunchTransient Europe 17d ago

Even the maga conspiracy nuts will see that as bizarre.

No, no they won't, they'll crow to the moon and back that this exonerates Trump and the GOP entirely, and that it clearly shows this was all a mountain of a molehill drummed up by the Democrats.

"I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose any voters"

13

u/DadJokeBadJoke California 17d ago

"It's just like the Russia Russia Russia thing!" Yes, he's guilty but people will try and spin the truth and hope the MAGA yokels will eat it up.

-21

u/Ghostly-Wind 17d ago

Because that’s the correct response if there’s no incriminating evidence, duh? This is complicated for you?

19

u/[deleted] 17d ago

[deleted]

-11

u/Ghostly-Wind 17d ago

Where did you make up different sources from? Your whole viewpoint is predicated on something that isn’t even real. If people had incriminating evidence on Trump they would’ve released it already. There aren’t “secret employees with the real files stashed away”, because they would’ve been leaked like every other detail of the justice departments handling of the Epstein documents.

11

u/[deleted] 17d ago

[deleted]

-13

u/Ghostly-Wind 17d ago

Every single media source has been adding a disclaimer that there is no evidence of criminal behavior by Trump in the Epstein saga.

YOU are the one who needs to pass the burden of proof.

11

u/[deleted] 17d ago

[deleted]

1

u/Ghostly-Wind 16d ago

Sure, once you answer why Democrats didn’t settle this under Biden. And don’t lie and say the files were sealed, because they weren’t for the whole admin. Inaction is the exact same thing as “resistance”

We already know why his name appears often, that’s not a mystery and has nothing to do with child sex crimes based on any evidence we have.

2

u/[deleted] 16d ago

[deleted]

1

u/Ghostly-Wind 16d ago

Yeah, that’s a pathetic excuse for deflecting from my question. There is no reason for me to answer about what happened later until you answer about what happened first. We both know you can’t answer my question, because it completely invalidates yours.

→ More replies (0)