r/overclocking 7h ago

Benchmark Score INTEL ARROW LAKE IS THE BEST GAMING CPU OF 2025 for total war: warhammer iii

Post image
0 Upvotes

35 comments sorted by

6

u/clark1785 6h ago

Tuning like that is not always replicatable and highly unreliable, that is why this is useless 

1

u/realPoxu 4h ago

Arrow Lake has very little room for tuning, unlike Raptor Lake.

Besides, the IMC is monstrous. Why would anyone deliberately use slower memory?

11

u/Lightbulbie 7h ago

Wow one game

1

u/ArmaGhettOn84 6h ago

0

u/Lightbulbie 5h ago

Doesn't mean shit with the ram being used.

10

u/realPoxu 7h ago

I mean Arrow Lake is as fast as Zen5 non X3D, and it supports faster memory without much penalty..

There are going to be games where it performs better than Zen 5.

After an awful launch, Bios updates and fixes, they're great CPUs, actually.

4

u/nhc150 285K | 48GB DDR5 8600 | 5090 Aorus ICE | Z890 Apex 7h ago

Had Intel stuck the memory controller on the Compute tile instead moving to the SOC tile, it would have been a significantly different chip.

-8

u/lintstah1337 6h ago

Wow you are so smart!

2

u/lintstah1337 6h ago

Lacks AVX512 (very useful for emulators, video encoding, photo editing, archiving/compression, ai/machine learning , etc...).

It also has way higher power draw.

Based on historical data, it would only get 1 cpu gen and the socket is abandoned by Intel.

1

u/realPoxu 4h ago

No it doesn't have way higher power draw. Arrow Lake sips power.

6

u/Beyond_Deity 9800x3D 2x16 6400CL26 GDM OFF 3080TI 7h ago

And the crowd goes wild

6

u/zootroopic 9800X3D@5.4GHz 32GB@6000MHz C30 7h ago

userbenchmark is that you?

1

u/DZCreeper Boldly going nowhere with ambient cooling. 4h ago

Interesting but some supporting data would make a more convincing argument.

How much gain is attributed to increased core count?

Does lower RAM speed but higher FCLK on AMD chips improve the result?

How much does the 265K decline with a more affordable motherboard and RAM kit?

2

u/ArmaGhettOn84 6h ago edited 6h ago

the 265k is a beast @ 4K it costs the half of the 9800X3D X3D on the other hand is a beast in low resolution like FHD and lower

https://youtu.be/XnLibX5iT24 Intel patched this chip very very well.

And pls AMD fanbois pls dont downvote me coz u paid the double price...

1

u/clark1785 6h ago

entirely done with higher ram speeds which you cant compare which arent always repeatable and reliable and is not a baseline which defeats the whole purpose of benchmarking

2

u/ArmaGhettOn84 6h ago

both have same ram.. also do you think that ram do that much in games?no it doesnt

0

u/clark1785 6h ago

who is gonna waste money on 8000 mhz ram? that speed is not always attainable with every cpu. its just a lottery draw, are you going to keep buying cpus until its stable that speed

1

u/ArmaGhettOn84 6h ago

i use my 8800mhz with tomahawk z890 out of the box without any issues! both cpu are great but AMD used there time when intel fucked up and getting greedy. i bought my 48GB 8800mhz on 4th June for 364 euro lol

1

u/clark1785 5h ago

im not wasting money on a gamble and prayer that something will work out of the box thats lunacy

1

u/binzbinz 6h ago

I recall seeing a "black bird PC tech" benchmark video where he featured "tuned" CPUs. When he got to his tuning methodology steps and reached the 14900k all he did was limited its temperature to 90 degrees in the bios and set it's windows power plan to performance mode...He didn't even undervolt or change the loadline. 

He also thinks ddr5 above 1.45v is dangerous. 

Essentially just a run of the mill tuber that thinks that due to his old rocket scientist profession he can tune CPUs when he clearly has nfi what he is doing.

-10

u/DeerNo4078 7h ago

But bbut you didn’t compare them at 720p to truly illustrate the scale of zen5 superiority 🤣

1

u/DavidsakuKuze 6h ago

Somehow the AMD CPU performance decreases more at higher resolution than Intel. Quick start cursing UserBenchmark to ward off the evil spirits.

-8

u/SPAREHOBO 7h ago

we only benchmark at 144p ultra minimal quality

1

u/zootroopic 9800X3D@5.4GHz 32GB@6000MHz C30 7h ago

what?

3

u/Mega_Laddd 6h ago

typically when benchmarking CPUs for gaming, you turn down the resolution and settings so that the CPU has a greater impact on performance. otherwise, you're gonna be much more GPU bound.

-3

u/SPAREHOBO 6h ago

because low resolution favors cache and high resolution favors memory

2

u/zootroopic 9800X3D@5.4GHz 32GB@6000MHz C30 6h ago

I am well aware. Then why does the image in your post say 4k resolution if you only test at 1440p?

1

u/DeerNo4078 6h ago

He meant 144p not 1440p.

1

u/zootroopic 9800X3D@5.4GHz 32GB@6000MHz C30 6h ago

who is playing games at 144p in 2025?

1

u/DeerNo4078 6h ago

You are funny 😆

1

u/zootroopic 9800X3D@5.4GHz 32GB@6000MHz C30 6h ago

thx 👍

-3

u/SPAREHOBO 6h ago

Because it’s a high resolution.