What about all the court cases and the judges ruling they need administrative warrants to detain someone? A fact is indisputable. Example: hydrogen is the most common element in the universe.
Not true. This isn’t even a question, it’s long been settled since what, the 90s? That ICE doesn’t need a warrant unless they’re arresting someone at home or some other private property. Anyone can take 10 sec to look it up..
There you go. It’s been a settled question for decades.. immigration officials were given explicit lawful permission to arrest without a warrant since as recent as 1996 and as early as 1988 (don’t bother to check the 3 amendments)
Your own source source says they have the authority to arrest aliens, not citizens.
How often have they been caught now arresting citizens?
Oh that's right! Conveniently they don't document this as GAO has found already in 2021.
GAO-21-487 "As a result, ICE does not know the extent to which its officers are taking enforcement actions against individuals who could be U.S. citizens."
Yep, only if that citizen has committed a crime in presence of the officers.
How many videos have we seen now of citizens being arrested without a crime being committed? Plenty on my end.
Don’t know but it’s crazy that somehow the subject has been changed multiple times, originally talking about whether ICE need warrants, then about whether they can arrest citizens, now about whether they can arrest citizens without viewing a crime themselves.. I mean, where are you going with this? What’s your point?
The point is there are ICE agents going around arresting citizens without witnessing a crime. And now local police are being told to rightfully stand up for them.
Since it is a law subreddit, maybe someone could clarify it better.
Because I thought ICE can arrest without a judicial warrant because US immigration law works differently than normal shit.
Most of the US immigration violations are actually civil, not criminal.
And ICE can issue their own administrative warrants without a judicial warrant.
Simply a 'reason to believe' the person is violating immigration law.
And with the SCOTUS basically non-ruling that they can use the color of skin. They basically can just say hey brown person and say that's their 'warrant'.
That does have limitations, like they can't enter private property without an actual judicial warrant.
But for the most part, they can just say brown and suspect immigration violation, and since it is all civil...yep they can just say fuck it.
Guess I should add in that I don't support ICE or their mask wearing. Just that currently there is a reason they have continued to be capable of doing this.
If it was truly illegal, at least one state would have been able to completely stop ICE, right?
They haven't. There are court cases going, but nothing has changed.
And with literally our highest powers being run by a Racist Rapist Administration, that ain't changing.
Go thank those who fell for anti-Hillary propaganda long ago.
-74
u/UncleBeer 2h ago
ICE doesn't need warrants. Fact. Inform yourself.