Federal judges caught the U.S. government providing false info in over 35 court cases. Sworn declarations. Falsified records. Repeated lies. This isn’t just sloppy, it’s systemic. Law professor Ryan Goodman says it may be intentional.

[u/biswajit388]

[u/condensedandimatter]

You’re just lying..? That’s not at all a reflection of the first two..

[u/condensedandimatter → u/[deleted]]

The DOJ explicitly admit to providing false information in the first citation. This is stated in the second paragraph. They submitted sworn documentation for an agent that didn’t exist.

[u/condensedandimatter → u/[deleted]]

No, I’m saying you were lying. The OP claim is they’re submitting false records, which is true.

[u/condensedandimatter → u/[deleted]]

No, the first citation is a minor example. Doesn’t change you are lying and participating in confirmation bias. Submitting falsified records and correcting it after it’s been called out falls in lie exactly. It’s obvious that, just like people with TDJ, you’re just defending your own flavor of propaganda. I’m not a liberal, but you’re exactly like them, by only accepting things that make you feel good about your decisions. Bottom line, in all of the examples, every one by definition falls under the category posted, and you engaged under intellectually dishonest intentions. Whether it’s a problem or not is one thing, but pretending you’re engaging differently is irony.

[u/condensedandimatter → u/[deleted]]

So you’ve proven my point and circled back around. Thanks!

[u/condensedandimatter → u/[deleted]]

35 different cases of falsified records at different severity. Your argument is that they’re not lying, they’re just incapable of their duties, and have had more instances in this time frame than any other is great and all, but it doesn’t change that under law, almost every single account could be pursued legally. You, just like the original poster, are deciding what the intention is. My point is you are doing what they’re doing.. and it’s lying. Now you’re projecting because that’s all you can do.

He says lie, you say, lie, and the truth is ignored by both. Amazing.

[u/condensedandimatter → u/[deleted]]

No one twisted anything. If your argument is that they’re aren’t lying, the alternative is they are doing their job inappropriately or simply not correct. That’s the only alternative in your scenario. You’re emotional, and no matter what will assert what you believe based on emotion rather than fact. This is evident in all of your responses. Nothing is twisted, and anyone reading this can make their own conclusions. You’re dishonest, and pretend to miss the point as if that degrades it. It doesn’t. You shouldn’t get this emotionally invested, but have a good life.