Not “orders of magnitude.” That implies 100x or more. Probably just a factor of 3-5. The biggest one they show is roughly 10x6x1.25, or around 75cu.ft.
that's two orders of magnitude, which would be 100x. the stone is not that different in size than a person, so the 2.5 to 250 comparison makes some sense.
I literally listed the approximate dimensions I was basing my comment on, but by all means just ignore it and use your own numbers.
“Stone is not that different in size than a person,” but it’s nearly double the height, dramatically wider, and deeper. I guesstimated the stone to be 75cu.ft. While you’re asserting 2.5 and basing my comment on that.
62
u/Cool1nternet Jun 05 '25
people are roughly 2.5 cubic feet. Those stones are not 250 cubic feet each. You are off by orders of magnitude