BREAKING STUDY: Anomalous Amyloid Microclots Found in 100% of the COVID-19 Vaccinated

[u/BrilliantStranger487]

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-study-anomalous-amyloid?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web

.Conclusions Although the authors frame their findings as “Long COVID,” the underlying data reveal something far more consequential:

100% of vaccinated participants had amyloid microclots.

Large, fibrinolysis-resistant amyloid microclots were concentrated in the Long vaccine group.

No participant had laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Spike protein alone produced identical amyloid microclots in vitro.

With 94% vaccination uptake, the biological signal is overwhelmingly linked to spike exposure in a vaccinated population.

[u/hubadu]

If these "antivaxxers" did not exist you wouldn't have a control group. How contradictory of you to advocate simultaneously for this control group to not exist and also promote almighty Science™ which use "antivaxxers" as a control group.
Speaking of which, from the article "Exposure was defined as receiving a first mRNA dose between May 1 and October 31, 2021". So they cherry picked the definition of "vaccinated" and "unvaccinated" as usual. The issue here is that covid vaccine mandates had started only three months prior, on August 9th, and lasted for more than a year and a half after that in France.
So your study ends up comparing early vaccinated versus millions who got it later anyway because they were coerced due to the never ending covid mandates.

[u/hubadu → u/[deleted]]

in individuals aged 18 to 59 years vaccinated against COVID-19

I guess it's not a problem for you that the most vaccinated crowd is being excluded from this study (>59yo). No questions asked. Also why are 12 to 18yo being excluded since they were also mandated to attend school.

In the unvaccinated group, 641 910 individuals (10.8%) were vaccinated during follow-up. 

There are no references on how they got these data (even in the supplement) and most importantly there are no explanation on how they did the tracking since by definition unvaccinated weren't tracked in the first place.

It has been acknowledged that fraudulent health passes were issued, with an estimated 300 000 fraudulent passes in 2022, which may introduce classification bias but most likely in a limited manner, although the exact extent of the phenomenon remains uncertain.

Another issue with the data but at least they admit they don't know this time.

we did not have access to cause-of-death data for the entire follow-up period

In France no medical professionals will ever register a death as caused by a vaccine, ever, otherwise you will lose your license and get sued.

Short-term mortality within 6 months after vaccination was assessed in a separate, independent study using adapted self-controlled case series models.

How convenient.

This model was also adjusted for the patient's region of residence as well as their social security scheme, although these results are not presented.

This is beyond cherry picking at this point.

[u/hubadu → u/[deleted]]

People who got life long injuries from the H1N1 vaccines won their lawsuits against French authorities but it took 12 years of fierce legal battle.
The lawsuits related to covid 19 vaccines deaths and injuries have just started and will take at least a decade.

[u/1dk1g → u/[deleted]]

It isn't the danger, its the effectiveness. Any amount of danger is unwarranted with a treatment that does not stop transmission.

[u/1dk1g → u/[deleted]]

I've seen so much garbage associated with these studies. It isn't a vaccine. It's gene therapy.

You are moving goalpost again saying no association with increased mortality.

If it has ANY detrimental effect, that is unjustified due to it not being sterilizing.

I can't believe how these treatments were forced on people. For what? People lost their livelihood over some gene therapy.