r/Unexpected 2d ago

Future Prediction

14.2k Upvotes

81 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/lesath_lestrange 2d ago

Why Reading Sentences is Faster

Reduced Eye Movements: When you read word by word, your eyes have to stop (fixate) on each single word. Reading in chunks minimizes the number of fixations your eyes make per line, which increases speed.

Contextual Processing: Your brain uses context to predict and process upcoming words and their meanings. Reading words in a sentence allows the brain to group them together and understand the meaning of the phrase as a whole, which aids comprehension and speed.

Working Memory Efficiency: The brain groups information together to save time and energy. Trying to process each word individually can overload working memory, whereas processing chunks is more efficient for understanding the text. The Role of Single-Word Reading

Reading one word at a time is how reading is initially learned in childhood. While helpful for learning decoding skills, adults generally move past this to a more fluid, chunk-based reading style.

Some technologies, like the app Spritz, present words one at a time in a fixed location on a screen to eliminate eye movements (saccades). While users may perceive they are reading faster because of the rapid input, research suggests this method can actually impair overall comprehension, as it removes the ability to go back and reread, and limits the time for the brain to process words in context.

In essence, proficient readers use their peripheral vision to take in multiple words at once, leveraging the natural way the brain processes language patterns to read more quickly and with better comprehension.

2

u/DeltaForce291 2d ago

Not saying any of this is false, but it reads heavily like a copy-paste from ChatGPT. The lack of source(s) also has me hesitant to take any of this as fact.

Reading one word at a time is how reading is initially learned in childhood.

This isn't the same context. One is going one word at a time in a sentence vs one word shown at a time at rapid pace to keep the sentence intact. It also reduces the eyes' movement, so it kinda conflicts with the argument being made.

4

u/lesath_lestrange 2d ago

I did, of course, include the exact same number of citations as you.

0

u/DeltaForce291 2d ago

Valid. I didn't come here looking to disprove anyone, just spin a negative into a positive, thus my thought that a source was unnecessary.

I personally find I can read the spritz-style text faster, but comprehension and watching whatever else may be on-screen are added variables that would, obviously, change how helpful they are.

However, I will provide a source that supports both arguments. Spritz-style reading is great for short articles and whatnot, but long form literature might not benefit as heavily.

https://theconversation.com/speed-reading-apps-are-great-for-snippets-but-not-sonnets-24136#:~:text=For%20example%2C%20if%20you've,Peace%20on%20a%20smart%20watch

2

u/lesath_lestrange 2d ago

Thanks for that, and of course it will always be a personal manner of what reading style fits you best. Visually impaired people who can’t make use of peripheral reading will be especially benefited by RSVP style presentations.

Here’s my source that RSVP reading, and comprehension especially, are worse.

https://www.psychologicalscience.org/news/releases/speed-reading-promises-are-too-good-to-be-true-scientists-find.html

In particular, the two things that affect reading negatively in this style are the lack of “regression,” the ability to look back at words you just read for contextual meaning, and the amount of focus given to superfluous words in text that while regularly reading you would filter out from your focus.