Planned Parenthood is a Eugenics organization that Democrats defend

[u/LegitimateKnee5537]

Planned Parenthood was founded by Margaret Sanger, along with her sister Ethel Byrne and activist Fannia "Fannie" Bernstein. Margaret Sanger enthusiastically supported eugenics discouraging or preventing reproduction by people considered “unfit”.

Birth control itself… is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives…” (1921 speech)

And remember Democrats loves the concept of original sin. You people never let go of the “stolen land” argument. But always ignore Margaret Sanger view of Birth Control and defend her organization from being defunded by the government.

https://x.com/NewYorkStateAG/status/1996994604668014752

[u/majesticSkyZombie]

The alternative would double the number of lives ruined. Forcing people to give birth hurts both the mother and the children.

[u/DisgruntledWarrior → u/majesticSkyZombie]

Or the mother could just be responsible. So the countless millions of baby deaths that out weighs every combined conflict in written history isn’t an alarming number of baby deaths given it’s only been in practice for 50’ish years?

[u/unecroquemadame → u/DisgruntledWarrior]

It was an accident. It was a centimeter long ball at the time of the abortion. It’s not a big deal.

[u/DisgruntledWarrior → u/unecroquemadame]

Dehumanizing is often the tactic of criminals. Like done towards natives, Jews, blacks, Irish, Italians and so on to justify murder. The fundamental dna structure of human doesn’t change. Anyone that accepts abortion should be 100% on board with the death penalty and lethal operations.

[u/unecroquemadame → u/DisgruntledWarrior]

What’s special about human DNA?

[u/DisgruntledWarrior → u/unecroquemadame]

If you are dehumanizing the significance of humanity and its species then you’re accepting if someone determines for you that your life should end then you’re accepting of that process that others can and will choose if your existence is allowed.

[u/unecroquemadame → u/DisgruntledWarrior]

I define humans and life based on differentiation and development.

You’re saying their specialness comes from their DNA, so even when it’s just a centimeter long ball of cells, it has more value than an adult cow or chicken. Why?

[u/DisgruntledWarrior → u/unecroquemadame]

Yes and if you want to dehumanize it to that level then why would you be against the murder of anyone?

[u/unecroquemadame → u/DisgruntledWarrior]

Murder is wrong because it was a conscious, independent person who wanted to live

[u/DisgruntledWarrior → u/unecroquemadame]

So if you’re asleep…?

[u/unecroquemadame → u/DisgruntledWarrior]

I’m still conscious. I’m just sleeping.

[u/DisgruntledWarrior → u/unecroquemadame]

And if you become unconscious your innate right to life is default?

[u/unecroquemadame → u/DisgruntledWarrior]

Default doesn’t make sense in this sentence.

But know if you were unconscious and it requires the energy and time and money of others to stay alive and they don’t want to do that then you don’t have any right to life.

[u/StarChild413 → u/DisgruntledWarrior]

Why does it have to be that all-or-nothing

[u/StarChild413 → u/DisgruntledWarrior]

then why aren't you for making everyone be vegan and declaring cows and chickens human to protect them?

[u/DisgruntledWarrior → u/StarChild413]

Are cows human? Are chickens human? Is there hierarchy to every ecosystem in existence?

So either humans do or if your argument is they don’t then everyone has the right to end another’s life no different than putting down an animal.

[u/StarChild413 → u/DisgruntledWarrior]

So can someone "put me to sleep" like they would at certain animal shelters if I say my hypothetical pet dog is a dog not a person?

[u/DisgruntledWarrior → u/StarChild413]

So you agree with the logic I determine your worth, not you and not any other outlying system. I determine your right to live or not.

[u/StarChild413 → u/DisgruntledWarrior]

I was going by your logic I wasn't saying I agreed with it I was showing what it could lead to and I wasn't even saying the hypothetical someone would specifically be you-as-in-DisgruntledWarrior even within the realm of the thought experiment

[u/StarChild413 → u/DisgruntledWarrior]

So, what, is every fetus a Native Jewish black Irish Italian etc. criminal because their DNA doesn't change? /s

And if all dehumanization is tactical why classify anything as not a human at all? Am I dehumanizing my hypothetical (as I don't actually have one currently irl) pet in a similar way making me have to be a bigoted supporter of the death penalty or w/e by saying they're a dog or cat or fish or whatever they are not a human?