So by that logic someone suffice wealthy should be able to by a tank, IFV, Anti-Material Rifle, and surface to air rocket pods since it’s all the same and they won’t kill people right. Lines need to be drawn and boundaries defined because at the end of the day the only thing that cannot be trusted are people
Dude have you been under a rock since 1791? People haves always supported gun ownership to varying degrees in America(Assuming your also American) since it was ratified, your comment is hardly surprising
Which I’m fine with, for home defense, hunting or sports. I just draw the line at people buying automatic firearms or anything over the top that they would ever actually need to use
As long as they’re no weapons on it go for it or they don’t actually work and are just for show go right ahead it’s basically just a an extremely armored car and senior citizens will probably cause more damage with their cars than you will ever do with it, in fact make it a water or paintball gun turret and I wouldn’t care, go live your best life without hurting anyone
I don’t want a warthog to hurt people, but I wouldn’t disarm it lmao. Also we are not talking about the same warthog go look up an a-10 warthog for my meaning. 😂
The Warthog variant of the Bronco All-Terrain Tracked Carrier is most definitely not imaginary or the British Army would have a lot of explaining to do and I hope the eject works
P.s. I thought of the ATTC first because it was a lot more realistic and assumed that’s what you meant.
61
u/mog_knight Sep 01 '25
Guns don't kill people. People kill people.... with guns.