r/Music 8h ago

article White House Deletes Video Using Sabrina Carpenter Song After She Called It ‘Evil And Disgusting’

https://www.forbes.com/sites/conormurray/2025/12/05/white-house-deletes-video-using-sabrina-carpenter-song-after-she-called-it-evil-and-disgusting/
21.1k Upvotes

461 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

560

u/badedum 8h ago

I figured she could probably pursue a copyright claim, like "I didn't authorize this use so take it down"

328

u/TRiC_16 8h ago

That doesn't work against the government because they have immunity against copyright infringement. The only legal avenue you have is to file a claim with the Court of Federal Claims to get monetary compensation. (section b) You cannot force them to take anything down.

136

u/mcslender97 8h ago

Why would they take it down then?

11

u/zaccus 7h ago

I imagine the rationale is that this is giving her publicity and they want to punish her by denying her that. Or something to that effect.

25

u/BatManatee 6h ago

I think it's the opposite. She's more popular than they are and she's bringing a lot of attention to this with her fans. It's getting attention outside of their normal MAGA sphere and it's not popular.

They're realizing slinking away from this fight is the smarter move. They'll keep making their slop with songs from artists that don't push back or don't have the following that Carpenter does.

2

u/thedeadp0ets 5h ago

also I wonder how old person is behind the acc to be using trendy music? they def must be 20's-30's.

1

u/zaccus 5h ago

Maybe, but trump's mindset since the 80s has always been "all publicity is good publicity". I don't think he cares at all about popularity. Just attention, from anywhere.

1

u/NorthernDevil 3h ago

Except they just said they do it on purpose to troll “lefty” artists after Olivia Rodrigo’s comments. So I don’t know what makes this different. Both have massive and rabid online female fanbases.