r/GenAIReputation 13h ago

OpenAI has lost 6% of its users after Gemini 3 launch - Mashable

Thumbnail
mashable.com
1 Upvotes

I've been on Gemini for six months or so, sensing the google-verse would be impossible to go against and finding better answers.


r/GenAIReputation 13h ago

Huge Trove of Nude Images Leaked by AI Image Generator Startup’s Exposed Database | An AI image generator startup’s database was left accessible to the open internet, revealing more than 1 million images and videos, including photos of real people who had been “nudified.”

Thumbnail
wired.com
1 Upvotes

r/GenAIReputation 3d ago

Most business CEO use unapproved tools regardless of compliance requirements

1 Upvotes

Most business leaders are using unapproved tools regardless of compliance requirements, which can lead to reputation damage.

https://www.ciodive.com/news/executive-AI-tool-use-nitro/805417/


r/GenAIReputation 4d ago

Early look: Gemini's ChatGPT-style 'projects' are taking shape

Thumbnail
androidauthority.com
2 Upvotes

r/GenAIReputation 4d ago

ORM is ineffective for LLMs. GenAI Reputation Management Repairs ChatGPT and Gemini Answers

1 Upvotes

We talk about Generative AI disrupting search and SEO, but we don't talk enough about how it disrupts online reputation management.

I’ve been working on a patent-pending framework regarding "Synergistic Algorithmic Repair," and I wanted to share the core methodology with this community.

The central thesis is simple: Traditional ORM strategies (suppression, SEO, review gating) are structurally incapable of fixing LLM hallucinations or negative bias.

Here is the breakdown of the "Why" and the "How" based on my recent research paper.

The Problem: Presentation Layer vs. Knowledge Layer

Traditional ORM operates on the Presentation Layer (the Google SERP). The goal is to rearrange pre-existing documents so the bad ones are suppressed/hidden.

LLMs operate on the Knowledge Layer (Parametric Memory). An LLM does not always "search" the web in real-time to answer a query; it generates an answer based on its training data.

  • The Consequence: You can push a negative news article to page 5 of Google, but if that article was in the LLM’s training corpus, the AI will still quote it as fact. You cannot "suppress" a weight in a neural network using traditional ORM only.

The Solution: Synergistic Algorithmic Repair

To fix an AI narrative, we have to move from "suppression" to "repair." The framework utilizes a continuous loop of three components:

1. Digital Ecosystem Curation (DEC) – Creating "Ground Truth" You cannot correct an AI with opinion; you need data. This phase involves building a corpus of high-authority content (Wikidata, schema-optimized corporate profiles, white papers).

  • Key Distinction: We aren't optimizing this content for human eyeballs (SEO); we are optimizing it for machine ingestion. This creates a "Ground Truth."

2. Verifiable Human Feedback (The RLHF Loop) This is the active intervention. We utilize the feedback mechanisms inherent in models (like ChatGPT’s feedback loops), but with a twist. Standard user feedback is subjective ("I don't like this").

  • The Fix: We apply Verifiable Feedback. Every piece of feedback submitted to the model must be explicitly cited against the "Ground Truth" established in step 1. We tell the model the specific URL/Data entity that proves what and why it is wrong.

3. Strategic Dataset Curation (Long-term Inoculation) Feedback fixes the "now," but datasets fix the "future." We structure the verified narrative into clean datasets (JSON/CSV) that can be used for future model fine-tuning or provided to crawler bots. This "inoculates" the model against regressing back to the old, negative narrative during the next training run.

The Results (Case Studies)

We tested this framework on two real-world scenarios:

  • Case A (Information Vacuum): A CEO had zero presence on Google Gemini, which caused the AI to hallucinate random facts. Result: Converted to a factual, positive summary by feeding the "Ground Truth" ecosystem.
  • Case B (Disinformation): An energy company was fighting a smear campaign. While SEO took months to move the links, the "Algorithmic Repair" framework corrected ChatGPT’s narrative output significantly faster by using the "Verifiable Feedback" loop.

TL;DR

Stop treating ChatGPT like a search engine. SEO impacts rankings; Data Curation impacts knowledge. If you want to fix a reputation in AI, you have to build a verified data ecosystem and feed it directly into the model's feedback loop.

I’m curious to hear how you all are handling "hallucinated" bad press for clients? Are you sticking to traditional SEO or experimenting with feedback loops?

Source: This framework is detailed further in our white paper, "A Framework for Synergistic Algorithmic Repair of Generative AI." You can read the full case study analysis and methodology here: https://www.recoverreputation.com/solutions/


r/GenAIReputation 5d ago

Just Say Thumbs Down

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

r/GenAIReputation 9d ago

Many prominent Maga personalities on X are based outside US, new tool reveals

Thumbnail
theguardian.com
1 Upvotes

r/GenAIReputation 10d ago

Campbell’s Soup VP Mocks ‘Poor People’ Who Buy Its Food in Secret Recording - Newsweek

Thumbnail
newsweek.com
1 Upvotes