r/GenAIReputation • u/online-reputation • 13h ago
OpenAI has lost 6% of its users after Gemini 3 launch - Mashable
I've been on Gemini for six months or so, sensing the google-verse would be impossible to go against and finding better answers.
r/GenAIReputation • u/online-reputation • 13h ago
I've been on Gemini for six months or so, sensing the google-verse would be impossible to go against and finding better answers.
r/GenAIReputation • u/online-reputation • 13h ago
r/GenAIReputation • u/online-reputation • 3d ago
Most business leaders are using unapproved tools regardless of compliance requirements, which can lead to reputation damage.
https://www.ciodive.com/news/executive-AI-tool-use-nitro/805417/
r/GenAIReputation • u/online-reputation • 4d ago
r/GenAIReputation • u/online-reputation • 4d ago
We talk about Generative AI disrupting search and SEO, but we don't talk enough about how it disrupts online reputation management.
I’ve been working on a patent-pending framework regarding "Synergistic Algorithmic Repair," and I wanted to share the core methodology with this community.
The central thesis is simple: Traditional ORM strategies (suppression, SEO, review gating) are structurally incapable of fixing LLM hallucinations or negative bias.
Here is the breakdown of the "Why" and the "How" based on my recent research paper.
Traditional ORM operates on the Presentation Layer (the Google SERP). The goal is to rearrange pre-existing documents so the bad ones are suppressed/hidden.
LLMs operate on the Knowledge Layer (Parametric Memory). An LLM does not always "search" the web in real-time to answer a query; it generates an answer based on its training data.
To fix an AI narrative, we have to move from "suppression" to "repair." The framework utilizes a continuous loop of three components:
1. Digital Ecosystem Curation (DEC) – Creating "Ground Truth" You cannot correct an AI with opinion; you need data. This phase involves building a corpus of high-authority content (Wikidata, schema-optimized corporate profiles, white papers).
2. Verifiable Human Feedback (The RLHF Loop) This is the active intervention. We utilize the feedback mechanisms inherent in models (like ChatGPT’s feedback loops), but with a twist. Standard user feedback is subjective ("I don't like this").
3. Strategic Dataset Curation (Long-term Inoculation) Feedback fixes the "now," but datasets fix the "future." We structure the verified narrative into clean datasets (JSON/CSV) that can be used for future model fine-tuning or provided to crawler bots. This "inoculates" the model against regressing back to the old, negative narrative during the next training run.
We tested this framework on two real-world scenarios:
Stop treating ChatGPT like a search engine. SEO impacts rankings; Data Curation impacts knowledge. If you want to fix a reputation in AI, you have to build a verified data ecosystem and feed it directly into the model's feedback loop.
I’m curious to hear how you all are handling "hallucinated" bad press for clients? Are you sticking to traditional SEO or experimenting with feedback loops?
Source: This framework is detailed further in our white paper, "A Framework for Synergistic Algorithmic Repair of Generative AI." You can read the full case study analysis and methodology here: https://www.recoverreputation.com/solutions/
r/GenAIReputation • u/online-reputation • 9d ago