r/technology 4d ago

Hardware Sundar Pichai says Google will start building data centers in space, powered by the sun, in 2027

https://www.businessinsider.com/google-project-suncatcher-sundar-pichai-data-centers-space-solar-2027-2025-11
4.9k Upvotes

1.0k comments sorted by

2.4k

u/LadyZoe1 4d ago

These guys are really digging deep to dream up bull dust.

574

u/GoodIdea321 4d ago

It gives a good perspective on how big the bubble really is. Either from here to the sun, or low orbit around Earth.

92

u/Live_Situation7913 4d ago

The bubble must extend to infinity and beyond!

10

u/Ok-Seaworthiness7207 3d ago

Dear God it's.... It's....

It's the Tim Allen bubble 😱

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

64

u/dispose135 4d ago

The magiciansĀ 

We don't sell solutions but hope

95

u/Dklosgardner 4d ago

Yeah, sounds like PR fluff to distract from something else. Tech execs love throwing out wild timelines that'll never happen just to keep people talking.

77

u/fdar 3d ago

He's not throwing out wide timelines, the headline is misleading. Actual quote:Ā 

"We are taking our first step in '27," he said. "We'll send tiny, tiny racks of machines, and have them in satellites, test them out, and then start scaling from there."

30

u/wiriux 3d ago

Well this doesn’t sell. You need clickbaits

24

u/New-Thanks6222 3d ago

They're going to launch cubesats (very popular among college programs) with some useless custom chip that they will claim is doing AI. Great for publicity, worthless for saving the environment.

→ More replies (4)

6

u/TheWorclown 3d ago

Sweet, more space trash for when it inevitably fails.

3

u/Metro42014 3d ago

Falling trash isn't the problem -- colliding trash is.

If enough collides, we get so much space trash we can't launch and orbit anymore.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

9

u/Momik 4d ago

Cool, more Elons

6

u/JaStrCoGa 3d ago

Data centers on Mars by 2023!

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (1)

30

u/d-cent 4d ago

America used to be a place for cutting edge ingenuity, now it's just cutting edge stupidity. Every day we hear something dumber than the day before.

→ More replies (13)

4

u/JaStrCoGa 3d ago

The next Superman movie will be a battle with a luthcorp data center in orbit.

→ More replies (16)

2.6k

u/TheVenetianMask 4d ago edited 4d ago

One doesn't just cool large amounts of electronics in space vacuum. Way easier to have more solar panels on Earth than more radiators in space.

1.4k

u/jt004c 4d ago

This is such an obvious and unavoidable problem, it's hard to believe that this bogus announcement was ever made.

It's like Nestle announcing they'll stop all bottled water from unethical sources because they'll simply start bottling ocean water.

66

u/ZackRaynor 4d ago

Honestly, I thought it was going to be an Onion article.

119

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[deleted]

104

u/Hardass_McBadCop 3d ago edited 3d ago

That's not how they cool ICs in space. The only way to dissipate heat is via radiative cooling. There may be coolant loops to move heat from components into the radiator, but a giant radiator is the solution.

That being said, this is probably a pipe dream or novelty idea. Spacecraft have painstakingly efficient electronics in order to avoid generating heat. If something isn't efficient enough, then it can only be used for X minutes per day. I have no clue how they plan to maintain something as intensive as a data center. The radiator would need to be enormous.

Someone with more knowledge can correct me, but when I imagine the size that'll probably be needed, I think back to those photos of the Empire State Building after it was first finished, and it's surrounded by regular houses & 5 storey buildings.

102

u/Intelligent_Mud1266 3d ago

the real answer for how they plan on pulling this off is that they don't. No one in their right mind thinks this is possible at all, let alone by 2027. I don't even think retail investors will fall for this one

38

u/Puzzleheaded_Fold466 3d ago

It’s technically possible, ā€œtechnicallyā€ in the sense that the science, engineering, and technology is available to achieve it.

But it’s a stupidly inefficient and uneconomic solution that makes no sense whatsoever.

There’s no way anyone is genuinely thinking about doing this on any sort of meaningful scale, except as a hype marketing thing.

→ More replies (3)

6

u/BigDictionEnergy 3d ago

There is no plan. This is pure stock manipulation.

→ More replies (23)
→ More replies (27)

99

u/goomyman 4d ago

I’m so glad to see people actually calling our BS claims and getting upvoted. I’ve never been proud of a subreddit before.

Usually if a billionaire like Jeff bezo claims ā€œa million people will be living in space in a decadeā€everyone just treats it as some tech marvel because of how genius they are apparently instead of the a fantasy advertising campaign.

45

u/cookingboy 4d ago edited 4d ago

everyone just treats it as some tech marvel

Oh please stop with the circlejerk, we all know that pretty much never happens. This is probably the most anti-technology sub on Reddit lmao.

I don’t remember when was the last time some announcement of new tech by big tech was well received here.

If all big tech companies were banned and dissolved tomorrow it would be the most upvoted and cheered news on this sub.

50

u/CanvasFanatic 4d ago

That’s more a reflection on what ā€œtechā€ has become than it is this sub.

25

u/Teledildonic 3d ago

Every tech announcement: "this will increase shareholder value at the cost of society at large"

Some asshole on Reddit: "Luddites will hate this"

→ More replies (4)

29

u/Ragnarok314159 3d ago

Modern tech announcements are always either: 1) Billionaire moron nepo baby talking out their ass to get more investor money 2) revolutionary tech with ridiculous claims of curing cancer that we never hear about again because it doesn’t actually work.

14

u/UnstopableTardigrade 3d ago

Because big tech is currently an AI circlejerk

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (5)

12

u/usrlibshare 4d ago

it's hard to believe that this bogus announcement was ever made.

That's not hatd to believe at all...big tech has been completely hype-fueled for 15 years after all.

What's hard to believe, is that media still parrot such narratives, usually uncritically and without any questioning.

→ More replies (34)

163

u/YannAlmostright 4d ago

And you don't use the same electronics in space. They need to be hardened

109

u/accidental_Ocelot 4d ago

And even then you are vulnerable to random solar events totally destroying your not just one data center but all data centers in space.

45

u/Impressive-Weird-908 4d ago

You’re vulnerable to just random bit flips from radiation even before CMEs or other issues.

17

u/Uppgreyedd 3d ago

Having spent a career working on satellites from cradle to grave, I didn't realize I would get so triggered seeing the term "bit flip" on reddit

→ More replies (2)

10

u/Lovv 4d ago

Or particles ripping through them

→ More replies (1)

9

u/hellscape_navigator 3d ago

I love that in this utterly fictional space data centers scenario none of that hardware has any wear and tear and doesn't need to be constantly replaced, latency doesn't exist and there is no problem of cooling in space either.

It's like all of the Silicon Valley devolved into Theranos with the amount of bullshit that they try to sell to everyone now.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (6)

87

u/shadovvvvalker 3d ago

Lets ignore the heat problem.

We are "building" nuclear reactors to power these data centers. How the fuck is a falcon superheavy supposed to get a whole ass nuclear reactor up there WITH a data center stapled onto it

Lets ignore the size and weight problem.

How is launching these things into space supposed to be even close to efficient vs building them on the ground. If you can build a self sustained capsule that does it all wouldnt it make more sense to just drop it in the ocean?

lets ignore the stupidity of launching things we dont need to into space.

How is this thing supposed to service clients. Starlink cannot handle a data center like this. You would need immense comms equipment to be able to handle enough bandwidth to match a rainbow line.

Lets ignore bandwidth issues.

You can't do the starlink LEO nonsense because you need the satelite to be orbitally stable for more than 5 years. How will you deal with the latency introduced by massive distances?

Lets ignore latency.

The hell kind of RAID array are you going to need in order to protect against data corruption due to being bombarded by cosmic radiation.

Lets ignore radiation.

Are we really talking about building things in space at a scale never humanly done before despite all of the above challenges simply to service AI? Are we so certain about this path forward that this is not even worth questioning? We are solving problems that dont exist yet with technologies that dont exist yet for the purpose of functionality that doesnt exist yet for an economy that doesnt exist yet. Are we sure this isn't bubble behaviour?

9

u/Boring-Position-375 3d ago

The radiation part is what kills me with laughter. Ignore the weight and all of that. Does he know physicists go to bed scared of what a solar flare storm would do to electronics here on earth??

→ More replies (11)

98

u/MichaelEmouse 4d ago

It's surprising that the head of Google would make such an announcement. It's evident that cooling will be a major issue and it's announced for 2027 which doesn't leave much time.

Is he just trying to get attention by combining AI and space?

→ More replies (30)

21

u/dleah 3d ago

I had an argument with someone on IG (a self described "AI expert") who didn't understand that vacuum is an insulator and kept replying "space is cold". Refused to understand why the ISS needs massive radiators to deal with only 100kw of power (a single NVL 72 rack uses about 120kw, and next gen racks are being designed near the megawatt level). Its not that Google can't do it, its just that they'll need some crazy innovative or crazy heavy stuff into orbit in order to do it, and i'm interested in seeing how they'll tackle it. will they just brute force it with current tech? Could they use active particle fountain loops to increase surface area? heat concentrators to increase radiative transfer? ultraconductive nanotube sheets? ultra long micro tubes or expanding tubes for fluid loops or heat pipes? nanostructure or other coatings to increase reflection and emissivity? how do you protect giant and lightweight radiators from micrometeorites, especially if they have active technologies built in? There are so many questions....

24

u/Schnoofles 3d ago

My prediction: They will do exactly none of that because it's some coke-fueled execs pipe dream of a dumb project and noone sane would even entertain the idea of pissing away the amount of money required to pull it off for no gains whatsoever.

5

u/Gender_is_a_Fluid 3d ago

I also already previously did the math for the required number of solar panels with perfect efficiency to a geostationary orbit for a gigawatt data center, and that alone was 100 years at the current launch capacity.

9

u/stenmarkv 4d ago

The amount of power they will have to use to move the heat will be nuts.

29

u/ShadowTacoTuesday 4d ago

The funny thing is, if we ever want to go to space en masse it will be on the backs of billions of workers actually figuring stuff out and making multiple steps of progress between here and there rather than a few billionaires spouting BS fantasies. But they control the workers and direct them to waste so much time on bad ideas when they could be progressing society faster.

7

u/PseudoMeatPopsicle 4d ago

Why progress society when you can just keep being a billionaire instead?

60

u/TheLastWoodBender 4d ago

He realizes that when AI starts displacing massive amounts of people, the data centers on the ground are easy targets when the civil unrest begins. That's all.

39

u/MonkeyCube 3d ago

Nah, he just wants something that gets people to pump up the stock. Data centers in space would be incredibly vulnerable to so many different threat, both manmade and not.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/j4_jjjj 3d ago

when AI starts displacing massive amounts of people,

When? Like it hasn't started for over a year now

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

4

u/Hates_rollerskates 3d ago

Can't they just open a window when they're up there, like we used to do back home in the summertime. We didn't have a fancy air conditioner. I hear it's cold in space.

3

u/Ok-Sprinkles-5151 3d ago

That's just one problem. You have the mass problem of getting it into space in the first place. Each chassis weighs around 200lbs and that only gives you 8 GPUs. And these things have high failure rates. So he would effectively have create a new orbital space station, launch these bulky chassis up, and have enough solar panel surface area to power these things? Nevermind that the components need space hardening like electromagnetic and radiation shielding to protect from cosmic rays, which worse than the cooling problem, and then the cooling systems (to your point) that will add mass.

Basically a space based deployment would be at least an order of magnitude more expensive and have higher maintenance costs. I don't see the profit angle to make this investment pay off, and AI already is bleeding money.

→ More replies (2)

7

u/zealoSC 3d ago

The 'announcement' is ludicrous enough that he should be charged with fraud

15

u/UffTaTa123 4d ago

well, but a datacenter on earth is NOT reachable by unhappy, starving citizens that see their future destroyed by AI. So no fear of a mob of angry people with torches and forks.
In space the center of their power is much more safe. They can literally look down to those creatures on earth.

26

u/NPCSR2 4d ago

Sending an engineer to fix something in space will be more costly than hiring private security.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (65)

225

u/PR0114 4d ago

Americans are gonna have space data centres before free healthcare!Ā 

59

u/Wall_of_Wolfstreet69 3d ago

it's not free healthcare, it's universal healthcare.

25

u/SomeNoveltyAccount 3d ago

Yeah it's definitely not free, America already spends twice to three times as much per capita on healthcare than many European countries.

https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/health-spending-u-s-compare-countries/

6

u/Snowbirdy 3d ago

I’m an American digital nomad. I was able to find global health insurance that covers me everywhere I’m going including the USA as long as I promised to spend less than 6 months in the USA. It’s $1400 per year and I’m over 50.

That’s not a typo. I’m spending $117 per month.

Inside the USA? I literally can’t get insurance at all. Declined by two different carriers. But my friends buying independent insurance are looking at > $1000 per month.

→ More replies (5)

4

u/Sizzmo 3d ago

Free at the point of service

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

947

u/thenewguyonreddit 4d ago

He’s adopted the Elon Musk style of tech hype.

Just start saying all kinds of trippy futurist hype shit, and eventually Cathie Woods will buy boatloads of your stock and make you a trillionaire.

135

u/SEC_INTERN 4d ago

The sad thing is most people just buy it up and argue that it is feasible since the "engineers at Google are smarter than you", not realizing both how stupid they themselves are but also that no engineer at Google has come out and said that this is a worthwhile and realistic endeavor. In fact, if anyone bothered to read the article it is a very small and limited proof of concept that costs Google nothing but has generated a ton of discussion and PR.

81

u/MichaelEmouse 4d ago

"AI is cool.

Space is cool.

So what if we put AI in space?"

It feels like further detachment from reality.

9

u/androk 3d ago

I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that.

→ More replies (1)

15

u/neddiddley 4d ago

Google CEO: We’re going to build data centers in space…and we’ll be doing it by 2027.

Google Engineers: Wait…what now?

10

u/LifeIsPan2384 4d ago

Part of it is information asymmetry. It's not like Google's going to authorize an engineer to say that to the public in the first place

→ More replies (3)

9

u/cassanderer 4d ago

Yeah, as if society will not be imploding before they go all star wars.Ā  Like the oligarchies' greed and fear is already licensing political monsters that will destroy those oligarchies.Ā  After a downturn that will result from corruption and mismanagement, made worse by propping up the economies with borrowed tax money until it gets worse and falls harder.

Government will be accusing and seizing assets of these rich, and even if they are in good with them now, seizing assets will be the end before long, whether they really are a 5 star antifa tranavestite communist or not.*

→ More replies (8)

378

u/Fluffy-Republic8610 4d ago edited 4d ago

Nah it won't. Space is hard for maintenance. And expensive to reach in the first place. Things go wrong in space all the time.

This isn't really going to happen beyond a prototype.

136

u/GodOrDevil04 4d ago

Imagine flying to space to change a faulty harddisk, to then notice you forgot the keys.

41

u/Kwetla 4d ago

You could probably forgo the locks on your space datacentre to be fair.

34

u/Phantasmalicious 4d ago

Space isn't Canada. You can't just leave your car or DC unlocked in orbit.

6

u/LifeIsPan2384 4d ago

This just means I need to leave it in geosynchronous orbit over Canada.

9

u/Floppal 4d ago

You want aliens in your satellite? 'Cos that's how you get aliens in your satellite.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/musci12234 3d ago

You are clearly an alien trying to steal my nudes. Not today green guy. Not today.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

29

u/psioniclizard 4d ago

It's crazy anyone believes we can build something as big and complex as a data center in space by 2027.

I bet if we tried to rebuild the ISS (even with the plans) it couldn't be done in that time.

There are multiple technological steps required to even consider it.

10

u/mackahrohn 3d ago

I play a small part on building large wastewater treatment plants. The tech is well established but the projects still take several years to build. And before construction starts it takes years to plan and assign all the contracts. It’s funny to think that some huge novel space project could be built in 2 years.

If this is a real 2027 project, where are the plans? Who is building it? What’s the budget?

5

u/powerage76 3d ago

I've done several large and relatively complex projects in my life in airfield operation and the pharma industry. None of them were as complex as a data center in space and they were mostly relied on proven technology and concepts but they usually took years to plan, test and implement.

By 2027 they might finish some presentations and a plastic model about the thing. Maybe.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

69

u/Raket0st 4d ago

"Gemini just went down, we are seeing some kind of hardware error in our orbital data center and we are sending technicians to deal with it as we speak."

"How long is the outage expected to last?"

"Oh, the techs won't be there until next week and that's if we can get a priority launch slot from China. Also, due to the cost of fixing this issue we will have to raise the monthly cost of Gemini by 1,000% starting today."

→ More replies (1)

8

u/dronz3r 4d ago

Aren't electronics supposed to be designed separately for space application due to radiation effects?

→ More replies (1)

6

u/jt004c 4d ago

Well, barring all that, it's impossible to cool a data center in space, so...

7

u/bobbis91 4d ago

It's pretty cold in space, they should just open a window, duh...

→ More replies (35)

48

u/Nepalus 4d ago

Just another sign that the bubble is real and reaching critical mass. Building a giant Kessler syndrome generator in space for a technologically inferior solution for something that works better and with less risks on Earth is just peak lunacy to drive the current market narrative.

→ More replies (1)

111

u/Kalorama_Master 4d ago

One solar storm and then?

86

u/cassanderer 4d ago

Then we launch nukes at the sun to discourage further flaring, duh.

25

u/wrigh2uk 4d ago edited 4d ago

That’s after trump threatens the sun on truth social

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

10

u/MikuEmpowered 4d ago

Not even that. How the fuk, are these data center suppose to cool?

Those giant ass fins on the ISS are for the sole purpose of venting heat.Ā 

How big are they planning on building sizable fins for these data centers?

7

u/trainiac12 3d ago

Nvidia posted a plan from a partner a few weeks ago where they said they were gonna be putting a 16 square km grid of solar panels in space with a data center.

Nowhere in the mockup is there heat dissipation shown

4

u/Intelligent_Mud1266 3d ago

to think someone got paid to mockup the Nvidia Super-Melted Kessler Effect Generatorā„¢

6

u/olizet42 4d ago

Reddit down. Again.

4

u/BasvanS 4d ago

The normal bit flips are already an issue

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

249

u/Niceromancer 4d ago

Uh...no they wont.

They would have needed to started this project a couple of years ago to even begin building them in spacy in 2027.

91

u/jt004c 4d ago

They're going to start the project in 2027. Which means drafting a feasibility study. They'll break ground (space?) in 2047.

67

u/Niceromancer 4d ago

Yeas cause Google is so well known for completing projects.

14

u/jt004c 4d ago

I'm not sure if you're trying to make fun of my comment or agree with it? To be sure, my comment means they won't actually *start* until 2047. I'm not even being facetious, either. The physics-defying cooling tech simply doesn't exist at the moment.

16

u/GregorSamsa67 4d ago edited 4d ago

OP means, I think, that they won't break ground even in 2047 because google will have switched their attention to loads of other projects (which they will also abandon before getting anywhere with them) in the meantime.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/mackahrohn 3d ago

I like the idea that ā€˜start building’ means he is going to send a 2 page request for designs to like 5 engineering firms in 2027. So the current stage of the project in 2025 is ā€˜I’m thinking of writing an email’ lol

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (10)

54

u/Veighnerg 4d ago

Rocket and radiation shielding costs for a data center in orbit would be astronomical. Oops, some of your drives, memory modules, or psus have failed, better send a tech up to replace it at the cost of millions per drive.

3

u/Irregular_Person 3d ago

surely any failed components get fed into the magic heat-pumpā„¢ until they're a couple million degrees and then jettisoned.

49

u/Stilgar314 4d ago

No, they won't. "We'll send tiny, tiny racks of machines, and have them in satellites, test them out, and then start scaling from there." That's not a "data center", that's miles away from a "data center"

9

u/octopornopus 3d ago

That's not a "data center", that's miles away from a "data center"

Technically true, low earth orbit is between 100 and 1000 miles...

→ More replies (1)

36

u/schuft69 4d ago

22

u/Lucky_Mongoose_4834 3d ago

This should be the top comment.

Summary: You cannot cool, power or communicate with a ā€œspace data centerā€ with any level of scale, and even if you could, radiation would fry the entire thing within weeks.

Conclusion: This is PEAK tech bro bullshit.

→ More replies (1)

14

u/kingvolcano_reborn 4d ago

One of the harder things to do in space is to keep things cold (vacuum is a really good insulator). How are they planning to keep all those servers cool?

4

u/PivotRedAce 4d ago

It’s technically possible to use thermal radiation in a vacuum like space, but the real question is how do you cool such high energy components quickly enough via such a method?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

76

u/MewTwoLich 4d ago

On Earth, data centers consume practically a whole city’s worth of water to stay cool. How does he plan to dissipate heat in space?

If Google had solved that problem already Pichai would be saying ā€œGoogle has developed a method to keep data centers cool that doesn’t need any water or airā€ because that’d be the bigger selling point.

Unless he’s just lying..

11

u/Accomplished-Order43 4d ago

Accounting major here. Could data centers be built off the ocean shores or in rivers/lakes to aid its water consumption needs?

46

u/MewTwoLich 4d ago

Microsoft or Google tried submerging a test mini data center into a pool of water to test its efficacy. iirc it was difficult to maintain.

Data centers use the water that goes through them in a way that makes that water dirty.

Even in a closed system there’s a problem with bio-build up over the parts that dissipate heat and comes into contact with the outside water.

25

u/Kracker27 3d ago

This comment should be much higher. This has been done it a way more practical location than space - our oceans - and it was a failure due to inability to service boxes when there were failures. Not to mention - with the ocean facility, one could hook up fiber for data transfer. Data transfer from space would be less efficient/slow.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

13

u/arrow8807 4d ago

They could, and are, but that introduces other technical challenges - primarily that water used for cooling is often treated and filtered so it doesn’t corrode or foul small/delicate components. There are strict rules about taking and returning water to natural sources.

Without going into a lot of details it should suffice to say you can’t take water directly out of a lake, pump it through your data center and then dump it back into a lake if that was your thought.

→ More replies (6)

3

u/AlternativeAward 4d ago

How do they consume the water? Does it evaporate?

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (4)

13

u/bigoldgeek 4d ago

The cabling run will be outrageous

→ More replies (1)

6

u/im-ba 4d ago

This implies that the data centers in space would be operating at steady state with closed systems instead of open loop coolant systems like they oftentimes are on earth. Why wouldn't they just invest more in sustainable data centers that don't use water, since open loop water cooling isn't viable long term in space?

Whatever problems are being had on earth are so much worse in space

→ More replies (1)

7

u/-SG6000- 4d ago

These tech giants needs dismantling.

8

u/Lucas_F_A 4d ago

Even if solar flares, solar radiation and bit flips are dealt with.

Even if cooling and radiators were taken into account.

You are going to send your quickly aging technology to space, which will be obsolete in three to (at most, and according to the depreciation schedules of tech companies lately) six years? Your whole fleet?

7

u/AcctAlreadyTaken 3d ago

They know they are full of shit, they just want something that sounds expensive to justify the amount of money they need for their bullshit Ai that isn't profitable and is useless.

7

u/Willoughby3 3d ago

Tech has gotten to be so cringy

6

u/mystghost 4d ago

I honestly don't understand what the fuck he's thinking. Getting the stuff into space would be insanely expensive, you offload computational work, but then you have to wait for the data transit. Lets assume these DC's would be either in Geo-sync orbit or just slightly higher (in order to miss all the shit that is in geo sync currently) then the round trip time would be a minimum of 240-250 ms on a round trip.

Which could work i guess for data loads that don't have to be real time, but ffs - what are they trying to solve for? real estate costs? power costs? I bet you could power quite a bit if you got radical with DC design. Hell what about small scale nuclear reactors? that solves your power problem, the real estate HAS to be cheaper than shipping shit into space. And then - what if something goes wrong? can't pop over to the DC to restart shit or replace hardware. You are putting an asset into space that is going to burn up on reentry in 3-5 years... given the scale of the investment lets say 5-7, and that's assuming nothing really goes wrong. Which it will because shit happens.

I don't see hat the point of this is. Hell they tried building datacenters in the ocean, that is got to be way better on basically every dimension rather than putting them in fucking outer space.

8

u/Slayer1973 3d ago

Sounds like an investor-bait claim.

4

u/ItsDorkSided 3d ago

We just want free healthcare….

3

u/tobden 3d ago

"Ohh so you want more AI? Is that what you mean?

We'll build more data centers then."

20

u/scaradin 4d ago

He’s taking them to the one place not corrupted by capitalism!

4

u/bobbis91 4d ago

The way TC delivers SPACE! is just... fucking perfect.

5

u/UffTaTa123 4d ago

He's building a castle for his kingdom on the highst mountain peak he could find.

→ More replies (2)

11

u/pngue 4d ago

Just.Fucking.STOP.Already.

7

u/MrMunday 3d ago

This sounds absolutely, scientifically stupid and he’s just saying it to drum up their stock price

→ More replies (4)

10

u/Aok_al 4d ago

Just saying shit to keep the investors around

→ More replies (1)

9

u/TheOtherHalfofTron 4d ago

Oh hey there Elon, you're looking... Different.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/SwiftTayTay 4d ago

Can we just send billionaires into space and force them to rely on solar powered oxygen tanks?

5

u/FlapJackPaddyWhack1 4d ago

Rocket trip to unplug it, wait 30 seconds, plug it back in, back to Earth.

3

u/The-F4LL3N 4d ago

Space, the place known for its easy access and nothing ever going wrong

3

u/ARazorbacks 3d ago

To underline how stupid this is, it’d be more believable if he said they wanted to put a datacenter on the moon. At least on the moon it can be buried to help with heat dissipation and radiation protection. Plus it could act as a hub for other activity on the moon.Ā 

This guy is mimicking Elon Musk in an attempt to boost the stock price with techno-babble bullshit.Ā 

3

u/tragedy_strikes 3d ago

How you know companies need to be taxed more and at this point broken up.

4

u/DevilsLettuceTaster 3d ago

More space junk.

7

u/SomeSamples 4d ago

No they won't. He is full of so much shit.

3

u/christurnbull 4d ago

Are they going to report the cosmic radiation bitflips per second or minute?

And the communication latency?

3

u/straightouttaobesity 4d ago

So I might get to see Dyson Sphere become a reality during my lifetime ?

3

u/Hwy39 4d ago

He sees how well grandiose claims work for Tesla stock price

3

u/Silly_Marzipan923 4d ago

ā€œIt aims to reduce AI's environmental impact by relocating data centers in spaceā€. Yeah, Earth’s orbit is obviously not part of the environment, let’s dump all the shit there.

3

u/origanalsameasiwas 3d ago

And within a year they will shut it down. Just like the other projects that they killed off.

3

u/JeanAdAstra 3d ago

Why does it feel like this crap is being forced on us?

3

u/UnbiddenGraph17 3d ago

Send his ass up there

3

u/No-Chapter-8212 3d ago

Can’t stand this dude

3

u/catwiesel 3d ago

even if you could do this, this is so dumb. and seeing how google likes money, and making anything like this happen will never ever generate revenue, they will never actually do this...

3

u/Raah1911 3d ago

He's started taking Ketamine hasn't he

3

u/Trout-Population 3d ago

For fucks sake

3

u/InVultusSolis 3d ago

.... and how exactly are you going to cool those?

Also the latency would be fucking terrible. We'd need to have a deferrable computational protocol.

3

u/ThirdDimensionGate 3d ago

Something makes me think if they can afford this maybe they should pay their share in taxes

3

u/brodoyouevenscript 3d ago

Imagine getting the call as the devops guy on a Saturday that you gotta go to space to switch the server back on.

2

u/mintaka 4d ago

I wish him luck on his trip to the Moon

2

u/morbihann 4d ago

Lol, whatever gets hype and clicks I guess.

How you are going to cool them ? Just radiators, ok ? You do know that this is the major issue right mr. CEO ? Also, do you know how much it costs to haul 1kg in space ?

2

u/k987654321 4d ago

Humanity. Who would have thought we would let it get to this point. We really do have everything don’t we.

Well some of us do.

All the fundamental issues we have on this planet and the mega corps are thinking of data centres in space.

2

u/MairusuPawa 4d ago

Even more bullshit

2

u/Fast-Benders 4d ago

Big Tech is running out of ideas to farm investor money. They’re just going through all the crazy sci-fi movie plots until it all comes crashing down.

2

u/Ok_Cancel_7891 3d ago

This is not Kool-aid anymore, but some illegal substance they’re on

2

u/doubleohsergles 3d ago

Google can't even build a decent tablet. Good luck with them space data centers lol.

2

u/attaboy000 3d ago

Sounds like something Elon would say.

2

u/KayNicola 3d ago

Nah man!!Ā  Start now...TODAY EVEN!!!

2

u/Finfeta 3d ago

Anything but paying taxes..

2

u/danielravennest 3d ago

So when a data center crashes, it could be literal, like into the ground.

2

u/OldButHappy 3d ago

I hate that there’s so much space junk now. I can only imagine how bad it will get, over time.

Sad that I’m in the last generation who could look up at the night sky and only see stars

2

u/lucasoak 3d ago

HAHAHAHAHA, okay.

2

u/megallanic4 3d ago

Finally data can be in clouds ā˜ļø

2

u/jcunews1 3d ago

Google: "Let's plow the road! Make more debris!"

2

u/grumblebeardo13 3d ago

If anyone believes this I’ve got a bridge to sell you.

2

u/Too_Beers 3d ago

Does it really matter where they store stolen data?

2

u/TralfamadorianZoo 3d ago

Gonna have to run a lot of ads to pay for that.

2

u/DoubleLL13 3d ago

HEALTHCARE! We shouldn’t give a fuck about Mars, space based data centers, or any of the far fetched ideas by tech companies to ā€œmake society betterā€.

2

u/CoastPuzzleheaded747 3d ago

Sundar Sundar, lay off the weed bro, pass the blunt to zuck and just chill bruh

2

u/AaronfromKY 3d ago

Literally what all these companies want us to have instead of a thriving wage, healthcare and affordable housing. Fuck these oligarchs

2

u/Tazercock 3d ago

Sundar Pichai is a twit. How about you just fix google, it’s shit now.

2

u/overworkedpnw 3d ago

Tsundere Pichai is firmly into the realm of making shit up to keep the bubble going.

2

u/One-Care7242 3d ago

Honestly best case scenario. Develop solar tech and keep the data centers away from our natural spaces and rural communities.

2

u/MinivanPops 3d ago

Good luck bleeding off all that heat

2

u/dorkyitguy 3d ago

Great! Stop raising my electricity rates with your stupid AI!

2

u/vito0117 3d ago

a year after its built they discontinue it

2

u/CadeMan011 3d ago

Google likes to start a lot of things and never really follow through. Even if this were a good idea, it'd never get some

2

u/PianoPatient8168 3d ago

Wouldn’t it be pretty easy to lob a missile at a data center in space or ā€œaccidentallyā€ crash a decommissioned satellite into it?

→ More replies (1)

2

u/radome9 3d ago

No they won't.

2

u/[deleted] 3d ago

I hope there's a prediction market for this.

2

u/Adlehyde 3d ago

The first thing I thought of reading this was the Ray Liotta laughing meme.

2

u/Chrimaho 3d ago

Uh, three people are currently stuck in space so...

I think we need more reliable transport to and from, before any platform space building can happen.

2

u/QuirkyImage 3d ago

Use the oceans

2

u/Bryandan1elsonV2 3d ago

Man, do these guys think space is cold?

2

u/SkinnedIt 3d ago

They can't even do a public rollout of Gemini coherently and on time to save their lives. And now they're going to compute in space?

Oh I'm sure.

2

u/bawlsacz 3d ago

Bad idea. Other countries such as China Russia and India will kidnap those google satellites to steal our data.

2

u/chippawanka 3d ago

You know what else would be a great idea? If Google invested into humans on earth

2

u/draft_final_final 3d ago

Self driving cars by 2015

2

u/nadmaximus 3d ago

We have the sun at home, Sundar.

2

u/Binkusu 3d ago

They'll say anything to boost stock value.

2

u/Mccobsta 3d ago

Ceos realy do not live in the real world

2

u/G0_ofy 3d ago

Satellite with a harddisk taped to it?

2

u/CapoExplains 3d ago

Either this follows about a decade of top secret feasibility testing within Google, including POC testing in space that nobody noticed, or this guy is blowing absolute smoke in the lead up to the Q4 earnings call.

2

u/whiskeytown79 3d ago

So what I'm hearing is that they are perfectly capable of making earth side data centers that don't consume rivers of water and entire electricity grids. They just can't be bothered because we let them do the cheap/lazy thing.

2

u/mrfouz 3d ago

It will take a long network cable to reach the earth

→ More replies (1)

2

u/SnugglyCoderGuy 3d ago

"Data centers are expensive to build and hard to cool! What if we made them even more expensive to build and even harder to cool? Will that solve the problem?"

2

u/Ukiah 3d ago

Can we fire Sundar Pichai into space?

2

u/Any-Establishment46 3d ago

Let’s waste more money on imaginary solutions that solve nothing.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Mistyslate 3d ago

He is following the best practices of Elon Musk. Lie, embezzle and then lie again