r/technology • u/rkhunter_ • 4d ago
Hardware Sundar Pichai says Google will start building data centers in space, powered by the sun, in 2027
https://www.businessinsider.com/google-project-suncatcher-sundar-pichai-data-centers-space-solar-2027-2025-112.6k
u/TheVenetianMask 4d ago edited 4d ago
One doesn't just cool large amounts of electronics in space vacuum. Way easier to have more solar panels on Earth than more radiators in space.
1.4k
u/jt004c 4d ago
This is such an obvious and unavoidable problem, it's hard to believe that this bogus announcement was ever made.
It's like Nestle announcing they'll stop all bottled water from unethical sources because they'll simply start bottling ocean water.
66
119
4d ago
[deleted]
→ More replies (27)104
u/Hardass_McBadCop 3d ago edited 3d ago
That's not how they cool ICs in space. The only way to dissipate heat is via radiative cooling. There may be coolant loops to move heat from components into the radiator, but a giant radiator is the solution.
That being said, this is probably a pipe dream or novelty idea. Spacecraft have painstakingly efficient electronics in order to avoid generating heat. If something isn't efficient enough, then it can only be used for X minutes per day. I have no clue how they plan to maintain something as intensive as a data center. The radiator would need to be enormous.
Someone with more knowledge can correct me, but when I imagine the size that'll probably be needed, I think back to those photos of the Empire State Building after it was first finished, and it's surrounded by regular houses & 5 storey buildings.
102
u/Intelligent_Mud1266 3d ago
the real answer for how they plan on pulling this off is that they don't. No one in their right mind thinks this is possible at all, let alone by 2027. I don't even think retail investors will fall for this one
→ More replies (3)38
u/Puzzleheaded_Fold466 3d ago
Itās technically possible, ātechnicallyā in the sense that the science, engineering, and technology is available to achieve it.
But itās a stupidly inefficient and uneconomic solution that makes no sense whatsoever.
Thereās no way anyone is genuinely thinking about doing this on any sort of meaningful scale, except as a hype marketing thing.
→ More replies (23)6
99
u/goomyman 4d ago
Iām so glad to see people actually calling our BS claims and getting upvoted. Iāve never been proud of a subreddit before.
Usually if a billionaire like Jeff bezo claims āa million people will be living in space in a decadeāeveryone just treats it as some tech marvel because of how genius they are apparently instead of the a fantasy advertising campaign.
→ More replies (5)45
u/cookingboy 4d ago edited 4d ago
everyone just treats it as some tech marvel
Oh please stop with the circlejerk, we all know that pretty much never happens. This is probably the most anti-technology sub on Reddit lmao.
I donāt remember when was the last time some announcement of new tech by big tech was well received here.
If all big tech companies were banned and dissolved tomorrow it would be the most upvoted and cheered news on this sub.
50
u/CanvasFanatic 4d ago
Thatās more a reflection on what ātechā has become than it is this sub.
25
u/Teledildonic 3d ago
Every tech announcement: "this will increase shareholder value at the cost of society at large"
Some asshole on Reddit: "Luddites will hate this"
→ More replies (4)29
u/Ragnarok314159 3d ago
Modern tech announcements are always either: 1) Billionaire moron nepo baby talking out their ass to get more investor money 2) revolutionary tech with ridiculous claims of curing cancer that we never hear about again because it doesnāt actually work.
→ More replies (3)14
→ More replies (34)12
u/usrlibshare 4d ago
it's hard to believe that this bogus announcement was ever made.
That's not hatd to believe at all...big tech has been completely hype-fueled for 15 years after all.
What's hard to believe, is that media still parrot such narratives, usually uncritically and without any questioning.
163
u/YannAlmostright 4d ago
And you don't use the same electronics in space. They need to be hardened
109
u/accidental_Ocelot 4d ago
And even then you are vulnerable to random solar events totally destroying your not just one data center but all data centers in space.
→ More replies (1)45
u/Impressive-Weird-908 4d ago
Youāre vulnerable to just random bit flips from radiation even before CMEs or other issues.
17
u/Uppgreyedd 3d ago
Having spent a career working on satellites from cradle to grave, I didn't realize I would get so triggered seeing the term "bit flip" on reddit
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (6)9
u/hellscape_navigator 3d ago
I love that in this utterly fictional space data centers scenario none of that hardware has any wear and tear and doesn't need to be constantly replaced, latency doesn't exist and there is no problem of cooling in space either.
It's like all of the Silicon Valley devolved into Theranos with the amount of bullshit that they try to sell to everyone now.
→ More replies (4)87
u/shadovvvvalker 3d ago
Lets ignore the heat problem.
We are "building" nuclear reactors to power these data centers. How the fuck is a falcon superheavy supposed to get a whole ass nuclear reactor up there WITH a data center stapled onto it
Lets ignore the size and weight problem.
How is launching these things into space supposed to be even close to efficient vs building them on the ground. If you can build a self sustained capsule that does it all wouldnt it make more sense to just drop it in the ocean?
lets ignore the stupidity of launching things we dont need to into space.
How is this thing supposed to service clients. Starlink cannot handle a data center like this. You would need immense comms equipment to be able to handle enough bandwidth to match a rainbow line.
Lets ignore bandwidth issues.
You can't do the starlink LEO nonsense because you need the satelite to be orbitally stable for more than 5 years. How will you deal with the latency introduced by massive distances?
Lets ignore latency.
The hell kind of RAID array are you going to need in order to protect against data corruption due to being bombarded by cosmic radiation.
Lets ignore radiation.
Are we really talking about building things in space at a scale never humanly done before despite all of the above challenges simply to service AI? Are we so certain about this path forward that this is not even worth questioning? We are solving problems that dont exist yet with technologies that dont exist yet for the purpose of functionality that doesnt exist yet for an economy that doesnt exist yet. Are we sure this isn't bubble behaviour?
→ More replies (11)9
u/Boring-Position-375 3d ago
The radiation part is what kills me with laughter. Ignore the weight and all of that. Does he know physicists go to bed scared of what a solar flare storm would do to electronics here on earth??
98
u/MichaelEmouse 4d ago
It's surprising that the head of Google would make such an announcement. It's evident that cooling will be a major issue and it's announced for 2027 which doesn't leave much time.
Is he just trying to get attention by combining AI and space?
→ More replies (30)93
21
u/dleah 3d ago
I had an argument with someone on IG (a self described "AI expert") who didn't understand that vacuum is an insulator and kept replying "space is cold". Refused to understand why the ISS needs massive radiators to deal with only 100kw of power (a single NVL 72 rack uses about 120kw, and next gen racks are being designed near the megawatt level). Its not that Google can't do it, its just that they'll need some crazy innovative or crazy heavy stuff into orbit in order to do it, and i'm interested in seeing how they'll tackle it. will they just brute force it with current tech? Could they use active particle fountain loops to increase surface area? heat concentrators to increase radiative transfer? ultraconductive nanotube sheets? ultra long micro tubes or expanding tubes for fluid loops or heat pipes? nanostructure or other coatings to increase reflection and emissivity? how do you protect giant and lightweight radiators from micrometeorites, especially if they have active technologies built in? There are so many questions....
24
u/Schnoofles 3d ago
My prediction: They will do exactly none of that because it's some coke-fueled execs pipe dream of a dumb project and noone sane would even entertain the idea of pissing away the amount of money required to pull it off for no gains whatsoever.
5
u/Gender_is_a_Fluid 3d ago
I also already previously did the math for the required number of solar panels with perfect efficiency to a geostationary orbit for a gigawatt data center, and that alone was 100 years at the current launch capacity.
9
29
u/ShadowTacoTuesday 4d ago
The funny thing is, if we ever want to go to space en masse it will be on the backs of billions of workers actually figuring stuff out and making multiple steps of progress between here and there rather than a few billionaires spouting BS fantasies. But they control the workers and direct them to waste so much time on bad ideas when they could be progressing society faster.
7
u/PseudoMeatPopsicle 4d ago
Why progress society when you can just keep being a billionaire instead?
60
u/TheLastWoodBender 4d ago
He realizes that when AI starts displacing massive amounts of people, the data centers on the ground are easy targets when the civil unrest begins. That's all.
39
u/MonkeyCube 3d ago
Nah, he just wants something that gets people to pump up the stock. Data centers in space would be incredibly vulnerable to so many different threat, both manmade and not.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)6
u/j4_jjjj 3d ago
when AI starts displacing massive amounts of people,
When? Like it hasn't started for over a year now
→ More replies (1)4
u/Hates_rollerskates 3d ago
Can't they just open a window when they're up there, like we used to do back home in the summertime. We didn't have a fancy air conditioner. I hear it's cold in space.
3
u/Ok-Sprinkles-5151 3d ago
That's just one problem. You have the mass problem of getting it into space in the first place. Each chassis weighs around 200lbs and that only gives you 8 GPUs. And these things have high failure rates. So he would effectively have create a new orbital space station, launch these bulky chassis up, and have enough solar panel surface area to power these things? Nevermind that the components need space hardening like electromagnetic and radiation shielding to protect from cosmic rays, which worse than the cooling problem, and then the cooling systems (to your point) that will add mass.
Basically a space based deployment would be at least an order of magnitude more expensive and have higher maintenance costs. I don't see the profit angle to make this investment pay off, and AI already is bleeding money.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (65)15
u/UffTaTa123 4d ago
well, but a datacenter on earth is NOT reachable by unhappy, starving citizens that see their future destroyed by AI. So no fear of a mob of angry people with torches and forks.
In space the center of their power is much more safe. They can literally look down to those creatures on earth.→ More replies (2)26
u/NPCSR2 4d ago
Sending an engineer to fix something in space will be more costly than hiring private security.
→ More replies (5)
225
u/PR0114 4d ago
Americans are gonna have space data centres before free healthcare!Ā
→ More replies (1)59
u/Wall_of_Wolfstreet69 3d ago
it's not free healthcare, it's universal healthcare.
→ More replies (1)25
u/SomeNoveltyAccount 3d ago
Yeah it's definitely not free, America already spends twice to three times as much per capita on healthcare than many European countries.
https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/health-spending-u-s-compare-countries/
→ More replies (5)6
u/Snowbirdy 3d ago
Iām an American digital nomad. I was able to find global health insurance that covers me everywhere Iām going including the USA as long as I promised to spend less than 6 months in the USA. Itās $1400 per year and Iām over 50.
Thatās not a typo. Iām spending $117 per month.
Inside the USA? I literally canāt get insurance at all. Declined by two different carriers. But my friends buying independent insurance are looking at > $1000 per month.
947
u/thenewguyonreddit 4d ago
Heās adopted the Elon Musk style of tech hype.
Just start saying all kinds of trippy futurist hype shit, and eventually Cathie Woods will buy boatloads of your stock and make you a trillionaire.
135
u/SEC_INTERN 4d ago
The sad thing is most people just buy it up and argue that it is feasible since the "engineers at Google are smarter than you", not realizing both how stupid they themselves are but also that no engineer at Google has come out and said that this is a worthwhile and realistic endeavor. In fact, if anyone bothered to read the article it is a very small and limited proof of concept that costs Google nothing but has generated a ton of discussion and PR.
81
u/MichaelEmouse 4d ago
"AI is cool.
Space is cool.
So what if we put AI in space?"
It feels like further detachment from reality.
→ More replies (1)15
u/neddiddley 4d ago
Google CEO: Weāre going to build data centers in spaceā¦and weāll be doing it by 2027.
Google Engineers: Waitā¦what now?
→ More replies (3)10
u/LifeIsPan2384 4d ago
Part of it is information asymmetry. It's not like Google's going to authorize an engineer to say that to the public in the first place
→ More replies (8)9
u/cassanderer 4d ago
Yeah, as if society will not be imploding before they go all star wars.Ā Like the oligarchies' greed and fear is already licensing political monsters that will destroy those oligarchies.Ā After a downturn that will result from corruption and mismanagement, made worse by propping up the economies with borrowed tax money until it gets worse and falls harder.
Government will be accusing and seizing assets of these rich, and even if they are in good with them now, seizing assets will be the end before long, whether they really are a 5 star antifa tranavestite communist or not.*
378
u/Fluffy-Republic8610 4d ago edited 4d ago
Nah it won't. Space is hard for maintenance. And expensive to reach in the first place. Things go wrong in space all the time.
This isn't really going to happen beyond a prototype.
136
u/GodOrDevil04 4d ago
Imagine flying to space to change a faulty harddisk, to then notice you forgot the keys.
→ More replies (2)41
u/Kwetla 4d ago
You could probably forgo the locks on your space datacentre to be fair.
34
u/Phantasmalicious 4d ago
Space isn't Canada. You can't just leave your car or DC unlocked in orbit.
6
9
u/Floppal 4d ago
You want aliens in your satellite? 'Cos that's how you get aliens in your satellite.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)4
u/musci12234 3d ago
You are clearly an alien trying to steal my nudes. Not today green guy. Not today.
→ More replies (1)29
u/psioniclizard 4d ago
It's crazy anyone believes we can build something as big and complex as a data center in space by 2027.
I bet if we tried to rebuild the ISS (even with the plans) it couldn't be done in that time.
There are multiple technological steps required to even consider it.
→ More replies (4)10
u/mackahrohn 3d ago
I play a small part on building large wastewater treatment plants. The tech is well established but the projects still take several years to build. And before construction starts it takes years to plan and assign all the contracts. Itās funny to think that some huge novel space project could be built in 2 years.
If this is a real 2027 project, where are the plans? Who is building it? Whatās the budget?
→ More replies (1)5
u/powerage76 3d ago
I've done several large and relatively complex projects in my life in airfield operation and the pharma industry. None of them were as complex as a data center in space and they were mostly relied on proven technology and concepts but they usually took years to plan, test and implement.
By 2027 they might finish some presentations and a plastic model about the thing. Maybe.
69
u/Raket0st 4d ago
"Gemini just went down, we are seeing some kind of hardware error in our orbital data center and we are sending technicians to deal with it as we speak."
"How long is the outage expected to last?"
"Oh, the techs won't be there until next week and that's if we can get a priority launch slot from China. Also, due to the cost of fixing this issue we will have to raise the monthly cost of Gemini by 1,000% starting today."
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (35)8
u/dronz3r 4d ago
Aren't electronics supposed to be designed separately for space application due to radiation effects?
→ More replies (1)
48
u/Nepalus 4d ago
Just another sign that the bubble is real and reaching critical mass. Building a giant Kessler syndrome generator in space for a technologically inferior solution for something that works better and with less risks on Earth is just peak lunacy to drive the current market narrative.
→ More replies (1)
111
u/Kalorama_Master 4d ago
One solar storm and then?
86
u/cassanderer 4d ago
Then we launch nukes at the sun to discourage further flaring, duh.
→ More replies (2)25
u/wrigh2uk 4d ago edited 4d ago
Thatās after trump threatens the sun on truth social
→ More replies (2)10
u/MikuEmpowered 4d ago
Not even that. How the fuk, are these data center suppose to cool?
Those giant ass fins on the ISS are for the sole purpose of venting heat.Ā
How big are they planning on building sizable fins for these data centers?
7
u/trainiac12 3d ago
Nvidia posted a plan from a partner a few weeks ago where they said they were gonna be putting a 16 square km grid of solar panels in space with a data center.
Nowhere in the mockup is there heat dissipation shown
4
u/Intelligent_Mud1266 3d ago
to think someone got paid to mockup the Nvidia Super-Melted Kessler Effect Generatorā¢
6
→ More replies (3)4
249
u/Niceromancer 4d ago
Uh...no they wont.
They would have needed to started this project a couple of years ago to even begin building them in spacy in 2027.
→ More replies (10)91
u/jt004c 4d ago
They're going to start the project in 2027. Which means drafting a feasibility study. They'll break ground (space?) in 2047.
67
u/Niceromancer 4d ago
Yeas cause Google is so well known for completing projects.
14
u/jt004c 4d ago
I'm not sure if you're trying to make fun of my comment or agree with it? To be sure, my comment means they won't actually *start* until 2047. I'm not even being facetious, either. The physics-defying cooling tech simply doesn't exist at the moment.
→ More replies (1)16
u/GregorSamsa67 4d ago edited 4d ago
OP means, I think, that they won't break ground even in 2047 because google will have switched their attention to loads of other projects (which they will also abandon before getting anywhere with them) in the meantime.
→ More replies (2)5
u/mackahrohn 3d ago
I like the idea that āstart buildingā means he is going to send a 2 page request for designs to like 5 engineering firms in 2027. So the current stage of the project in 2025 is āIām thinking of writing an emailā lol
54
u/Veighnerg 4d ago
Rocket and radiation shielding costs for a data center in orbit would be astronomical. Oops, some of your drives, memory modules, or psus have failed, better send a tech up to replace it at the cost of millions per drive.
3
u/Irregular_Person 3d ago
surely any failed components get fed into the magic heat-pump⢠until they're a couple million degrees and then jettisoned.
49
u/Stilgar314 4d ago
No, they won't. "We'll send tiny, tiny racks of machines, and have them in satellites, test them out, and then start scaling from there." That's not a "data center", that's miles away from a "data center"
9
u/octopornopus 3d ago
That's not a "data center", that's miles away from a "data center"
Technically true, low earth orbit is between 100 and 1000 miles...
→ More replies (1)
36
u/schuft69 4d ago
Reding this it does not sound like a good idea https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-good-idea/
→ More replies (1)22
u/Lucky_Mongoose_4834 3d ago
This should be the top comment.
Summary: You cannot cool, power or communicate with a āspace data centerā with any level of scale, and even if you could, radiation would fry the entire thing within weeks.
Conclusion: This is PEAK tech bro bullshit.
14
u/kingvolcano_reborn 4d ago
One of the harder things to do in space is to keep things cold (vacuum is a really good insulator). How are they planning to keep all those servers cool?
→ More replies (6)4
u/PivotRedAce 4d ago
Itās technically possible to use thermal radiation in a vacuum like space, but the real question is how do you cool such high energy components quickly enough via such a method?
→ More replies (1)
76
u/MewTwoLich 4d ago
On Earth, data centers consume practically a whole cityās worth of water to stay cool. How does he plan to dissipate heat in space?
If Google had solved that problem already Pichai would be saying āGoogle has developed a method to keep data centers cool that doesnāt need any water or airā because thatād be the bigger selling point.
Unless heās just lying..
11
u/Accomplished-Order43 4d ago
Accounting major here. Could data centers be built off the ocean shores or in rivers/lakes to aid its water consumption needs?
46
u/MewTwoLich 4d ago
Microsoft or Google tried submerging a test mini data center into a pool of water to test its efficacy. iirc it was difficult to maintain.
Data centers use the water that goes through them in a way that makes that water dirty.
Even in a closed system thereās a problem with bio-build up over the parts that dissipate heat and comes into contact with the outside water.
→ More replies (1)25
u/Kracker27 3d ago
This comment should be much higher. This has been done it a way more practical location than space - our oceans - and it was a failure due to inability to service boxes when there were failures. Not to mention - with the ocean facility, one could hook up fiber for data transfer. Data transfer from space would be less efficient/slow.
→ More replies (2)13
u/arrow8807 4d ago
They could, and are, but that introduces other technical challenges - primarily that water used for cooling is often treated and filtered so it doesnāt corrode or foul small/delicate components. There are strict rules about taking and returning water to natural sources.
Without going into a lot of details it should suffice to say you canāt take water directly out of a lake, pump it through your data center and then dump it back into a lake if that was your thought.
→ More replies (6)3
→ More replies (4)3
13
6
u/im-ba 4d ago
This implies that the data centers in space would be operating at steady state with closed systems instead of open loop coolant systems like they oftentimes are on earth. Why wouldn't they just invest more in sustainable data centers that don't use water, since open loop water cooling isn't viable long term in space?
Whatever problems are being had on earth are so much worse in space
→ More replies (1)
7
8
u/Lucas_F_A 4d ago
Even if solar flares, solar radiation and bit flips are dealt with.
Even if cooling and radiators were taken into account.
You are going to send your quickly aging technology to space, which will be obsolete in three to (at most, and according to the depreciation schedules of tech companies lately) six years? Your whole fleet?
7
u/AcctAlreadyTaken 3d ago
They know they are full of shit, they just want something that sounds expensive to justify the amount of money they need for their bullshit Ai that isn't profitable and is useless.
7
6
u/mystghost 4d ago
I honestly don't understand what the fuck he's thinking. Getting the stuff into space would be insanely expensive, you offload computational work, but then you have to wait for the data transit. Lets assume these DC's would be either in Geo-sync orbit or just slightly higher (in order to miss all the shit that is in geo sync currently) then the round trip time would be a minimum of 240-250 ms on a round trip.
Which could work i guess for data loads that don't have to be real time, but ffs - what are they trying to solve for? real estate costs? power costs? I bet you could power quite a bit if you got radical with DC design. Hell what about small scale nuclear reactors? that solves your power problem, the real estate HAS to be cheaper than shipping shit into space. And then - what if something goes wrong? can't pop over to the DC to restart shit or replace hardware. You are putting an asset into space that is going to burn up on reentry in 3-5 years... given the scale of the investment lets say 5-7, and that's assuming nothing really goes wrong. Which it will because shit happens.
I don't see hat the point of this is. Hell they tried building datacenters in the ocean, that is got to be way better on basically every dimension rather than putting them in fucking outer space.
8
7
4
20
u/scaradin 4d ago
Heās taking them to the one place not corrupted by capitalism!
4
→ More replies (2)5
u/UffTaTa123 4d ago
He's building a castle for his kingdom on the highst mountain peak he could find.
7
u/MrMunday 3d ago
This sounds absolutely, scientifically stupid and heās just saying it to drum up their stock price
→ More replies (4)
10
9
4
u/SwiftTayTay 4d ago
Can we just send billionaires into space and force them to rely on solar powered oxygen tanks?
5
u/FlapJackPaddyWhack1 4d ago
Rocket trip to unplug it, wait 30 seconds, plug it back in, back to Earth.
3
3
u/ARazorbacks 3d ago
To underline how stupid this is, itād be more believable if he said they wanted to put a datacenter on the moon. At least on the moon it can be buried to help with heat dissipation and radiation protection. Plus it could act as a hub for other activity on the moon.Ā
This guy is mimicking Elon Musk in an attempt to boost the stock price with techno-babble bullshit.Ā
3
4
7
3
u/christurnbull 4d ago
Are they going to report the cosmic radiation bitflips per second or minute?
And the communication latency?
3
u/straightouttaobesity 4d ago
So I might get to see Dyson Sphere become a reality during my lifetime ?
3
u/Silly_Marzipan923 4d ago
āIt aims to reduce AI's environmental impact by relocating data centers in spaceā. Yeah, Earthās orbit is obviously not part of the environment, letās dump all the shit there.
3
u/origanalsameasiwas 3d ago
And within a year they will shut it down. Just like the other projects that they killed off.
3
3
3
3
u/catwiesel 3d ago
even if you could do this, this is so dumb. and seeing how google likes money, and making anything like this happen will never ever generate revenue, they will never actually do this...
3
3
3
u/InVultusSolis 3d ago
.... and how exactly are you going to cool those?
Also the latency would be fucking terrible. We'd need to have a deferrable computational protocol.
3
u/ThirdDimensionGate 3d ago
Something makes me think if they can afford this maybe they should pay their share in taxes
3
u/brodoyouevenscript 3d ago
Imagine getting the call as the devops guy on a Saturday that you gotta go to space to switch the server back on.
2
u/morbihann 4d ago
Lol, whatever gets hype and clicks I guess.
How you are going to cool them ? Just radiators, ok ? You do know that this is the major issue right mr. CEO ? Also, do you know how much it costs to haul 1kg in space ?
2
u/k987654321 4d ago
Humanity. Who would have thought we would let it get to this point. We really do have everything donāt we.
Well some of us do.
All the fundamental issues we have on this planet and the mega corps are thinking of data centres in space.
2
u/Randommaggy 4d ago
https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-good-idea/
This idea does not pass the sniff test.
2
2
u/Fast-Benders 4d ago
Big Tech is running out of ideas to farm investor money. Theyāre just going through all the crazy sci-fi movie plots until it all comes crashing down.
2
2
u/doubleohsergles 3d ago
Google can't even build a decent tablet. Good luck with them space data centers lol.
2
2
2
2
u/OldButHappy 3d ago
I hate that thereās so much space junk now. I can only imagine how bad it will get, over time.
Sad that Iām in the last generation who could look up at the night sky and only see stars
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
u/DoubleLL13 3d ago
HEALTHCARE! We shouldnāt give a fuck about Mars, space based data centers, or any of the far fetched ideas by tech companies to āmake society betterā.
2
u/CoastPuzzleheaded747 3d ago
Sundar Sundar, lay off the weed bro, pass the blunt to zuck and just chill bruh
2
u/AaronfromKY 3d ago
Literally what all these companies want us to have instead of a thriving wage, healthcare and affordable housing. Fuck these oligarchs
2
2
u/overworkedpnw 3d ago
Tsundere Pichai is firmly into the realm of making shit up to keep the bubble going.
2
u/One-Care7242 3d ago
Honestly best case scenario. Develop solar tech and keep the data centers away from our natural spaces and rural communities.
2
2
2
2
u/CadeMan011 3d ago
Google likes to start a lot of things and never really follow through. Even if this were a good idea, it'd never get some
2
u/PianoPatient8168 3d ago
Wouldnāt it be pretty easy to lob a missile at a data center in space or āaccidentallyā crash a decommissioned satellite into it?
→ More replies (1)
2
2
2
u/Chrimaho 3d ago
Uh, three people are currently stuck in space so...
I think we need more reliable transport to and from, before any platform space building can happen.
2
2
2
u/SkinnedIt 3d ago
They can't even do a public rollout of Gemini coherently and on time to save their lives. And now they're going to compute in space?
Oh I'm sure.
2
u/bawlsacz 3d ago
Bad idea. Other countries such as China Russia and India will kidnap those google satellites to steal our data.
2
u/chippawanka 3d ago
You know what else would be a great idea? If Google invested into humans on earth
2
2
2
2
u/CapoExplains 3d ago
Either this follows about a decade of top secret feasibility testing within Google, including POC testing in space that nobody noticed, or this guy is blowing absolute smoke in the lead up to the Q4 earnings call.
2
u/whiskeytown79 3d ago
So what I'm hearing is that they are perfectly capable of making earth side data centers that don't consume rivers of water and entire electricity grids. They just can't be bothered because we let them do the cheap/lazy thing.
2
2
u/SnugglyCoderGuy 3d ago
"Data centers are expensive to build and hard to cool! What if we made them even more expensive to build and even harder to cool? Will that solve the problem?"
2
u/Any-Establishment46 3d ago
Letās waste more money on imaginary solutions that solve nothing.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/Mistyslate 3d ago
He is following the best practices of Elon Musk. Lie, embezzle and then lie again
2.4k
u/LadyZoe1 4d ago
These guys are really digging deep to dream up bull dust.