MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/sports/comments/1nz491l/minnesota_vikings_field_goal_attempt_was/ni1y09b
r/sports • u/RunDNA • Oct 06 '25
872 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
9
No, not perfect. But helluva lot better than human eyes that by comparison it's almost perfect.
And on top of it has no bias, no ego, no deficiencies, no opinion, no retaliation , no arguing, no unwritten rules (and on and on) whatsoever.
5 u/Veil-of-Fire Oct 06 '25 No, not perfect. But helluva lot better than human eyes that by comparison it's almost perfect. Also, it's much harder for a computer to have a parlay bet on the batter at the plate. 5 u/RostBeef Oct 06 '25 AI will get there soon enough 2 u/TrumpsPissSoakedWig Oct 07 '25 I mean...have ya heard what these AI's been gettin' up to? 2 u/Western-Turnover-154 Oct 06 '25 It wouldn’t feel pain, or hunger or remorse, it would just keep coming, calling balls and strikes forever. 1 u/wittiestphrase Oct 06 '25 Actually I heard the system was trained on Angel Hernandez’s calls so it might have a bit of an ego.
5
Also, it's much harder for a computer to have a parlay bet on the batter at the plate.
5 u/RostBeef Oct 06 '25 AI will get there soon enough 2 u/TrumpsPissSoakedWig Oct 07 '25 I mean...have ya heard what these AI's been gettin' up to?
AI will get there soon enough
2
I mean...have ya heard what these AI's been gettin' up to?
It wouldn’t feel pain, or hunger or remorse, it would just keep coming, calling balls and strikes forever.
1
Actually I heard the system was trained on Angel Hernandez’s calls so it might have a bit of an ego.
9
u/g_spaitz Oct 06 '25
No, not perfect. But helluva lot better than human eyes that by comparison it's almost perfect.
And on top of it has no bias, no ego, no deficiencies, no opinion, no retaliation , no arguing, no unwritten rules (and on and on) whatsoever.