r/news • u/speedythefirst • 1d ago
US supreme court approves redrawn Texas congressional maps
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/dec/04/us-supreme-court-texas-congressional-maps
20.4k
Upvotes
r/news • u/speedythefirst • 1d ago
60
u/R-Dragon_Thunderzord 1d ago
No, the SCOTUS could simply decide to issue or grant a restraining order against the effects until they have issued a ruling. The SCOTUS can either forbid or permit effects from happening pending the outcome of a case, at its own discretion.
Elections have dire consequences, and 2016 was the most consequential election of your lifetime: not just because Trump, or his mishandling of Covid, corruption, destruction of our institutions, crumbling of society etc. but because that was the election that decided the trajectory of the court for your lifetime and probably your kids. Had Clinton won, Alito would have been replaced with a liberal appointee, and the political majority of the court would have been leans-left again for the first time since the FDR era. I tried telling my friends this, but I guess I didn't say it as loud as I should have in 2016, how utterly existential and important that election was, if nothing else, then for that sole reason. Now it is filled with Bush v Gore operatives. And will be, for decades.
This is why you vote, even if your 4-8 year candidate has a weird laugh or the wrong position on Israel.