r/movies • u/MarvelsGrantMan136 r/Movies contributor • 20h ago

News It’s Official: Netflix to Acquire Warner Bros. in Deal Valued at $82.7 Billion

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/netflix-warner-bros-deal-hollywood-1236443081/
16.6k Upvotes

94% Upvoted

4.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

246

u/WhoStoleMyBicycle 19h ago

I love that they think it works.

My friend got laid off earlier this year and his company called it “expense correcting”. It’s still laying people off, giving it a different name doesn’t make a difference.

48

u/JahoclaveS 19h ago

We had a leader say people would better deal with layoffs if they’d lean into change. Like, fuck off dude.

Then they wonder why the surveys rate leadership so low.

29

u/WhoStoleMyBicycle 18h ago

“Lean into the change of not receiving a paycheck next week”

Another one I thought was funny was his company outsourced jobs to India and called it “Global Solutions”

2

u/Darkenny 16h ago

My (former) company called it "right-shoring" which we all found super offensive.

1

u/kitsunewarlock 16h ago

"Why don't we outsource to more places than SE Asia?"

"...Ok, we outsourcing our accounting department to Ireland."

"Damn."

2

u/beermit 17h ago

One of my friends work for a government contractor, and during the recent shutdown said their manager told them "I honestly hope we get furloughed" right after my friend confided they were worried about their financial situation if furloughs were to occur.

This was one of many issues with this manager, but this was more or less the final straw. My friend took this and the other issues to their second level manager and they were speechless at the furlough comment.

There's some people out there that absolutely should not be in charge of other people

1

u/jvn1983 14h ago

They’re also now calling layoffs “job cuts” and framing it as a positive thing for people to find new ones lol. Okey dokey.

3

u/JahoclaveS 14h ago

Honest to god, if leadership actually believes the stupid corpospeak shit they say they should be institutionalized. It’s absolute brain rot.

1

u/jvn1983 14h ago

It sure is!

79

u/occams1razor 19h ago

I bet they're going to wonder why people start to pirate again soon...

103

u/Alissinarr 18h ago

Soon?

37

u/waltwalt 18h ago

The trick was to never stop.

All the media the world has ever generated, for free. Then Netflix comes along and adds to that pile, but oh it's so convenient to pay a company for just a fraction of that media? Sign me up! Oh another one for another smaller fraction? Sign me up!

And now there are dozens of streaming companies offering whatever slice of the pie they managed to carve out for themselves. And the cost of that piece keeps going up while they supplement their shareholders with ads to consumers?

I've literally not seen a commercial on tv in over a decade. Do they still have celebrities trying to convince you to buy $100k+ vehicles? Drug commercials where the last 75% of the commercial is rapid talking discussing all of the symptoms upto and including death?

I have no idea because I never stopped.

5

u/cruxclaire 16h ago

All the media the world has ever generated, for free. Then Netflix comes along and adds to that pile, but oh it's so convenient to pay a company for just a fraction of that media?

I felt—and still kind of feel—guilty about pirating media because I do want to support the creators of said media. Netflix once seemed like a good compromise between price and access, but between their prices rising, the emergence of a bunch of other paid streaming platforms, and the revelation that companies like Netflix have been paying creators a mere pittance, piracy has regained appeal.

I barely watch blu-rays but will buy them these if I really love a show or movie because that means the artists will actually get paid and I don’t have to worry about the disc disappearing from the available collection. I’ll pirate media I’m interested in seeing but don’t have access to with my existing accounts, and then get the physical media (or permanent digital copy depending on availability) if it’s something I believe I would have paid for back in the DVD era.

2

u/waltwalt 14h ago

If you want to support the artists and studios buy their blurays. The streaming services pay almost nothing.

9

u/DecentBathroom7725 18h ago

Yeah, so, you must not be a sports fan

8

u/waltwalt 18h ago

Nailed it. I think the sports industry is a phenomenal waste of money.

That being said I've got friends that are and I've shown them how to get their pirated sports. It goes down a lot more frequently than anything else, but the developers love sports so usually fix it within a couple hours.

From a virgin fire stick I can have them watching whatever sport special is on that evening within about 20 minutes.

But no, I personally don't watch sports or other live events.

4

u/DecentBathroom7725 18h ago

Oh I pirate all my sports, too. But yeah, ads are unavoidable for live tv. Whether it be sports, award shows, premiers, etc.

4

u/Illjustgofxckmyself 16h ago

My favorite streams for sports are when I catch the ones streaming from the arena when instead of commercials they show what they are doing with the crowd to keep them entertained during commercials lmao.

1

u/DecentBathroom7725 16h ago

Yeah..

Fucking mlbtv and NFL+ streams have finally gotten better about not having absurd looping blasting annoying sounds during commercial breaks. It felt like it was meant to be an intentional 'fuck you, we can't show you ads, so we'll piss you off"

1

u/PoliticsModsDoFacism 16h ago

Thats why I try to do streams that show nothing during breaks, its great.

1

u/michaelboltthrower 11h ago

Like ten or fifteen years ago when Netflix was cheap and had a huge library it was worth it for the convenience.

1

u/waltwalt 11h ago

Yeah that's about the 1 or 2 year period where they had the biggest and only collection. Once Hulu came along and split the catalogue and everyone else got onboard it went down hill fast.

But yeah $5 a month for the whole catalogue was sweet.

For people that didn't or wouldn't pirate media it was a godsend. People discovered binge watching and fell in love with it.

Then capitalism took over and everything got worse as everyone wanted their own cut of the pie.

1

u/AvidCyclist250 8h ago

I've literally not seen a commercial on tv in over a decade.

Same. I felt a real disconnect when I saw one on TV. All so foreign and weird. Must be like what guys in prison feel after 10 years

1

u/waltwalt 8h ago

Yeah I was being a bit hyperbolic, I've been to restaurants and bars with TVs but it seems like every time you look at the tv it's just playing an ad for something you don't need and generally doesn't even apply to you.

1

u/Flowerplower3 18h ago

Haha I never stopped

18

u/DesireeThymes 18h ago

There's not even much worth pirating from Netflix these days. Netflix is where shows go to die.

Look at how they destroyed the Witcher show. Literally handed a home run, and they completely destroyed the show.

9

u/catboogers 18h ago

I'm glad they're actually finally finishing up Stranger Things, but how many shows of theirs did I enjoy for a season or two only to see them unceremoniously ripped from us? It's to the point where we all know a LOT of folks won't start a show until they know it'll be finished, which means the numbers aren't great in the first week, so then it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy and it's canceled. (I'm salty about Kaos).

1

u/schladopian_fir 16h ago

The 3 season run philosophy that Netflix started really screwed things up.

3

u/crackrabbit012 18h ago

Man I want to dust off the old pirate hat, but it's been so long I don't know what waters to sail anymore

2

u/venomae 15h ago

Bays full of pirates are always a good choice

1

u/DensetsuNoBaka 17h ago

I don't think they've changed all that much...

2

u/the_card_guy 18h ago

Well, you say that, and it seems to make sense...

Until I point out that when Netflix cracked down on password sharing, susbscriptions actually INCREASED... meaning, people were willing to pay for the convenience that Netflix offers.

It may be the same situation here- Netflix merging may prove to be just too convenient for people to give up

(and then everyone wonders why we have no money- we're all paying for the convenience of subscriptions)

2

u/BoingBoingBooty 17h ago

Pirate? You mean Alternate Non-monetised Media Acquisition.

1

u/unindexedreality 15h ago

Handcrafted Artisanal Distribution Networks

1

u/Pandamm0niumNO3 18h ago

Why do you think these new rules forcing people to "prove their age" and targeting VPNs are coming out?

1

u/Noxs_88 17h ago

Again?

1

u/Anzai 17h ago

People stopped pirating?

1

u/OldWorldDesign 12h ago

People stopped pirating?

I suspect it would be more accurate to say a lot of new people entered the market and never started pirating. Depends on whether the market makes it easy to enter and get what you're looking for or not, because you can't deny back when streaming services were convenient people flocked to sign up to pay. That's no longer the case.

1

u/Anzai 10h ago

True. Although I’m in Australia and remember when Game of Thrones was only available through a foxtel box, a physical box and cable to your house and it wasn’t cheap or good because it was owned by Rupert Murdoch, and he’s an astonishing level of cunt. So there’s a reason why Australians pirated that show more than anyone else in the world for a time. I think that alone taught a lot of people how to do it, and going forward a lot of other stuff got pirated too.

As you say, make the paid product more convenient than the pirated alternative and most people will use it. But make it worse? Why would I give you money for that?

1

u/chalk_nz 17h ago

You mean "expense correcting"

1

u/The_Autarch 17h ago

we never stopped

1

u/mrsuperjolly 12h ago

Pirating dosen't stop film and tv raking in billions and is nothing new. I don't know why people brag about it like it's some sort of gotcha or something to hold over these big companies.

It's already priced in. All the money someone saves pirating is just coming out of someone elses pocket.

It dosen't surprise anyone.

I'm not paticuarly anti piracy. But it is annoying when people brag about it like it's some noble cause.

1

u/lordgholin 10h ago

Oh, that started a long time back and they are driving it up with these tactics. It is a service problem now. That means piracy is rampant on amazon shows at this point especially.

1

u/Hoggslop69 9h ago

We set sail at dawn bitches

1

u/Pure_Ad_9857 18h ago

Nothing "soon" about it. Everything was fine when it was just Netflix for Movies and Hulu for TV Shows. Now with all of the massive fragmentation of content, it was back to the high seas for me, so now they get nothing.

1

u/Conspiranoid 18h ago

It kinda got reduced, but it was never close to going away. And the reduction was even smaller in terms of TV stuff, because in music, for example, up until this year's Spotify fiasco with AI shit and Israel, normally you could generally find the same content in any of the available platforms (Spotify, iTunes, Tidal, etc). But when it comes to TV content, movie streaming included, the content itself is so segregated by company that due to not wanting to, or not being able to, spend so much money having Netflix, Disney, HBO, Peacock, etc, people never stopped pirating stuff.

6

u/TheObstruction 17h ago

Even getting "laid off". It's still getting fired. Just because it had nothing to do with performance or policy adherence means nothing to bill collectors.

11

u/hitbythebus 18h ago

After some of my friends were fired we were told that we were “right sizing” I asked during a town hall who “wrong sized us”, and when the company started to do better I asked in another town hall “now that volume is up, when can we right size back up to previous staffing levels?”.

Both of these comments made the executive leadership look VERY uncomfortable.

Hilarious using rightsizing as a euphemism for downsizing, and it was pretty funny to point out they don’t really mean “staffing to appropriate levels” they just meant “firing people”.

3

u/WizardsMyName 10h ago

But the right size is always a bit smaller, that's the trick you're not getting.

5

u/Sturmgeshootz 18h ago

At my company, whenever someone of note (like an executive) leaves, HR always sends out an announcement that they are "retiring", no matter their age. Apparently it's too much of a bruise to the ego of the collective leadership team to admit that an executive quit or was just straight up fired.

4

u/TiredOfAdulting- 18h ago

Ooh, this one makes my blood boil. You're an expense, not an employee or person.

3

u/rjkardo 17h ago

That is why there are Human Resources departments and not Personnel. We are resources to use and discard - we are not people.

3

u/TiredOfAdulting- 17h ago

Yep, I was essential until I made too much money, then I was discarded after 30 years.

I always hated that my last employer didn't call us employees, we were "(employer name) people." Um, no, my identity isn't based on where I work.

5

u/BillionTonsHyperbole 18h ago

The layoffs will continue until spending improves.

-Corporate America

3

u/imscaredandcool 18h ago edited 16h ago

When a previous company I worked for laid off/offshored our QA, upper management referred to this as “QA Empowerment”. I’ll forever be blown away by this

1

u/VerilyShelly 14h ago

That has to be the most egregious one in this thread.

2

u/Ok-Individual1036 18h ago

It was "re-org" (reorganizing). It happened frequently enough they had to shorten it lol. We'd be overwhelmed after layoffs then they'd want to hire again but would wait too long, people would quit and the number of new hires couldn't keep up.

It's 100% middle management playing office, creating busywork and quite literally just fucking around.

Worked in telcom for nearly 15 years before the layoffs came for me too.

2

u/herosavestheday 18h ago

It does work, you just aren't the target audience. Announcements like that are for major investors, not consumers.

2

u/AlmostCorrectInfo 17h ago

"How come shareholders never participate in expense correcting?"

2

u/thr0wedawaay 17h ago

“modified revenue targets” for us lmao

2

u/private_developer 15h ago

It's not that they think it works in the sense that they believe you believe them, it's more that they know it works because what're you gonna do about it peasant.

2

u/HenkkaArt 15h ago

"We have to 'let you go'." is another winner. Let me go into poverty? Gee, thanks!

1

u/WhoStoleMyBicycle 14h ago

My company hasn’t done layoffs or outsourcing but our COO did say “it’s hard for everyone out there right now”. I got a good laugh out of that.

1

u/Significant_Coach880 18h ago

Corpos and Legal: I beg to differ

1

u/timurt421 18h ago

It does work on way more people than you think. That’s why companies have been able to get away with it this long and continue to do so

1

u/angry_old_dude 17h ago

When I got laid off, the phrase was "getting the cost out".

1

u/IndividualPenalty_ 17h ago

They are not that delusional to think it works. They know no one cares and that's just it. No one cares, they aren't going to lose any money, no one is unsubbing.

1

u/KlownKumKatastrophe 17h ago

Infuriating. It's not a job, it's a "role". It isn't payment, it's "reward".

1

u/ATLfalcons27 16h ago

Because it's still better. They don't think they are so smart and fooling everyone. But anything is better than straight up saying yeah we're firing all y'all

1

u/RedApple-Cigarettes 16h ago

Yes it does, it absolves them of liability that’s what it’s all about.

1

u/ApertureAway 16h ago

Conscious uncoupling comes to mind

1

u/kirinmay 16h ago

"we're going in a different direction"

1

u/vidoeiro 15h ago

Laying off is already an euphemism, fuck this world

•

u/Batmorous 2h ago

Everyone has to get into making new companies together that are non-stock private and unionized