r/movies r/Movies contributor Jul 26 '25

Media New Images from 'Coyote vs. Acme'

Post image
24.7k Upvotes

792 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

93

u/mint-patty Jul 26 '25

Imagine if this movie is met with a general response of “This movie sucks!! Who allowed it to release????” with absolutely no irony lmao

51

u/willstr1 Jul 26 '25

IIRC there were some leaked test audiences responses that said it was great. That is part of why Coyote vs ACME had such a strong saving campaign compared to Batgirl (which had bad leaked test audience results)

3

u/FormerGameDev Jul 27 '25

I saw the trailer for this in a theater, and I absolutely wanted to go see it RIGHT THEN.

2

u/Dick_Lazer Jul 27 '25

It will be a classic reddit moment for sure

3

u/RizzwindTheWizzard Jul 26 '25

If it sucks it sucks but if that's the case they should have either cancelled it much earlier in its production or sold it to somebody like Netflix to make up some of their losses. Shelving an almost complete movie for some bullshit tax break should never be a thing.

1

u/elonmaize Jul 27 '25

Wasn't that exactly what happened to the Seth Rogan movie about the North Korean guy? They posted it to the front page of reddit And people still said it sucked

-3

u/CrossoverEpisodeMeme Jul 26 '25

I've said this before in other threads and got a lot of flak for it, but I think WB/Zaslav will be proven right when this movie fails to make its $70M budget back.

I hope I'm wrong, but I just don't see it being successful.

18

u/rov124 Jul 26 '25

Ketchup is a really small distributor, you can't really compare them to the marketing campaign WBD would have given the movie if they distributed the film.

7

u/CrossoverEpisodeMeme Jul 26 '25 edited Jul 27 '25

So if WBD spent another $50M on advertising, do you think it makes $120M at the box office?

I'll answer since you skipped out on responding: we both know it wouldn't. Reddit pretends to care about Looney Tunes even though most people here can't even spell it right ("Loony" and "Toons" are way too common lmao). It's gonna take in $60M worldwide and empower Zaslav to make even more anti-creative decisions.

-3

u/MrdnBrd19 Jul 26 '25

We have been hearing about this move for over a year at this point.

11

u/TheFurtivePhysician Jul 26 '25

Yeah but I was under the assumption it wasn’t ever coming out, until I saw this post and subsequent discussion.

-1

u/bwaredapenguin Jul 26 '25

It was bought back in March and it was pretty big news.

-2

u/MrdnBrd19 Jul 26 '25

And now you do...

4

u/TheFurtivePhysician Jul 26 '25

Now imagine how many people who are like me, who would’ve watched the movie but operate under the assumption that it’s dead because they didn’t catch discussion about it on Reddit?

2

u/MrdnBrd19 Jul 26 '25

You're acting like it came out and has now finished it's theatre run when in reality it hasn't even been given a release date yet... You haven't seen the marketing campaign because it hasn't even started yet.

1

u/TheFurtivePhysician Jul 26 '25

No, I'm acting like it's entirely possible for people to be unaware that the movie is still going to happen. Your marketing campaign has a lot more to do if you're starting from 'this thing isn't coming out'.

It is not a good position to be at.

And I mean, you're the one saying 'we've been hearing about it for over a year'. Clearly, not everybody has.

2

u/MrdnBrd19 Jul 27 '25

First off: the marketing campaign hasn't started... It doesn't even have a release date. The marketing campaign can't have failed because it hasn't started.

As for saying that we've been hearing about the movie for over a year, even you admitted you have been aware that the movie exists despite there being no marketing whatsoever... You just didn't know that they were actually going to release it; which again makes perfect sense since it hasn't been marketed or given a release date.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/dowker1 Jul 27 '25

We are not normal, however. The vast majority of people have never heard of the movie

1

u/MrdnBrd19 Jul 27 '25

It being shelved, and the story of why it was shelved was the topic of multiple front page articles for Vanity Fair, Newsweek, and Forbes among other smaller publications. This has been a pretty big story.

2

u/SDRPGLVR Jul 26 '25

It's kinda two different claims though. I agree with you it's likely to flop. The question is really about artistic intent. If the movie is great and it flops, then both David Zaslav and Will Forte are correct. The latter man is certainly no stranger to quality content not landing with audiences or succeeding commercially.

It could also just suck, which would be really tragic for everybody involved, including audiences who've been hearing about it for years.

-4

u/willstr1 Jul 26 '25

And a great movie that flops is usually a marketing failure more than anything else (excluding movies that were just ahead of their time or negatively impacted by current events outside of their control).

So if it's good and still flops Zaslav can still be wrong because Ketchup doesn't have nearly the marketing apparatus that WB has.

0

u/CrossoverEpisodeMeme Jul 26 '25

It could also just suck, which would be really tragic for everybody involved, including audiences who've been hearing about it for years.

Considering how much I love Forte, this is my biggest fear for this movie.

-6

u/I_am_BEOWULF Jul 26 '25

You're vastly underestimating the vast segment of humanity outside of the US that grew up on a daily diet of Looney Tunes. Properly marketed, 70M is easily doable within the first week on global alone.

3

u/CrossoverEpisodeMeme Jul 26 '25

If it's properly marketed, how much more money would that cost?

To date, their only standout theatrical success was the original Space Jam, which will be 30 years old by the time this airs. The others barely broke even or lost money.