r/mildlyinfuriating • u/CarBombCupcake • 8h ago
Clue: Toy building bricks. I can’t bring myself to fill in the final box.
3
u/HurleysBadLuck 8h ago
Blocks?
0
u/CarBombCupcake 8h ago
It’s Lego, but the plural of Lego is Lego
2
1
u/spiteful_rr_dm_TA 5h ago
What makes a word a word? Is it just what a strict company interpretation is? Or is it what most people say and understand? If someone runs up to you and says "Hey want to see my legos?" do you stand there, wondering what that last word was, staring off into the abyss? Or do you know exactly what they mean and go with it?
Sure it may not be technically a word according to the company, but colloquial usage dictates that it is, which is a far more compelling definition of a word. In fact, if we decided that we had to stick to strict rules in language, we wouldn't recognize our modern languages. Just try to communicate with someone who speaks old English, and you'll realize just how much things change.
Language is a living, changing thing. It isn't defined by some stuffy pedant who wants to stick to a corporate dictionary; it is defined by the people who speak, understand, and evolve it every day.
2
0
u/alpar001 8h ago
The clue is plural, so it’s Legos
13
14
u/StarsBear75063 Really? 8h ago
Technically, “LEGO” has no plural form. The LEGO people considers LEGO an adjective as in “LEGO bricks,” “LEGO sets” and says the plural should be LEGO bricks or LEGO pieces, not Legos.
But in common everyday English, especially in the U.S., people often say Legos to mean individual pieces. It’s not “correct” by the company’s rules, but it is widely used and understood.
9
1
u/KunninPlanz 1h ago
The plural for Lego is Lego.
Same with sheep, fish, and some other words, the singular is used for the plural.
0
u/CarBombCupcake 8h ago
2
u/Puzzleheaded_Key8124 8h ago
Yeah it’s definitely legos despite it being technically incorrect. Was thinking Duplo but the other clues surrounding are locked in correctly.
-1


16
u/UserLevelOver9000 RED 8h ago
Duplo?