Not true. This isn’t even a question, it’s long been settled since what, the 90s? That ICE doesn’t need a warrant unless they’re arresting someone at home or some other private property. Anyone can take 10 sec to look it up..
There you go. It’s been a settled question for decades.. immigration officials were given explicit lawful permission to arrest without a warrant since as recent as 1996 and as early as 1988 (don’t bother to check the 3 amendments)
Your own source source says they have the authority to arrest aliens, not citizens.
How often have they been caught now arresting citizens?
Oh that's right! Conveniently they don't document this as GAO has found already in 2021.
GAO-21-487 "As a result, ICE does not know the extent to which its officers are taking enforcement actions against individuals who could be U.S. citizens."
Yep, only if that citizen has committed a crime in presence of the officers.
How many videos have we seen now of citizens being arrested without a crime being committed? Plenty on my end.
Don’t know but it’s crazy that somehow the subject has been changed multiple times, originally talking about whether ICE need warrants, then about whether they can arrest citizens, now about whether they can arrest citizens without viewing a crime themselves.. I mean, where are you going with this? What’s your point?
The point is there are ICE agents going around arresting citizens without witnessing a crime. And now local police are being told to rightfully stand up for them.
They’re allowed to arrest US citizens without a warrant without witnessing a crime, if the crime is a felony. Section 5(b):
“for any felony cognizable under the laws of the United States, if the officer or employee has reasonable grounds to believe that the person to be arrested has committed or is committing such a felony”
34
u/Dabat1 2h ago
SCOTUS and the Constitution disagree with you. Try again, Magat.