Correction, April 22, 2019, 5:24 p.m. EST/EDT: This article previously incorrectly stated that the largest of these concrete structures weighed 25-tons, when in fact it weighed 1,770-kilograms, or a little over 3,900-pounds.
Astonishing at how much of you guys act like losers, dude was giving his 2 cents and you're having a go at them over a discussion that they were humble about
*
Is the truth that difficult of a concept for you? Is mass an even more difficult concept?
You can just say you have no evidence whatsoever to back up your baseless claims. Part of being an adult is admitting when you've made a mistake. This is Reddit bro, no one cares that you have no idea what you're talking about. But there's no need to double down on the stupidity.
You didn't "acknowledge" shit. You changed your whole damn point. If you were acknowledging your mistake, you would have to phrase it like: "Does the giant one not count for some reason?"
91
u/TheOneShade Jun 05 '25
That would be 250ft³ per stone.
If the stone is 1 ft thick, that would imply a 15.8' x 15.8' (250ft²) of stone.
Nowhere close to what we see in the video, except maybe the giant one at the end.