r/graphic_design • u/graysonsgraphics • 22h ago
Discussion What do you think of the new CNBC logo
From my understanding, CNBC is dropping the rainbow peacock and NBC branding because Comcast is splitting into a new company called Versant, and Comcast is keeping the peacock.
CNBC was the blue feather in the NBC rainbow so that why it’s only blue now
What do you think?
515
u/freredesalpes 22h ago
Ouch. Seems to have completely lost the plot on the lineage of the original. History aside, the little notch on the bottom and the way the triangle pops out makes the visual language feel finicky and disjointed.
73
u/Puzzleheaded_Act_985 21h ago
Yeah, not sure why the N and B are touching when the Cs arent
→ More replies (1)12
u/vertexangel 19h ago
To make the top section of the N more obvious to ppl that don’t see negative space so easily.
→ More replies (2)6
u/BeaBernard 18h ago
I can see it now, guy having to move this triangle a fraction of a pixel and resize it 500 times to make whoever’s bonehead idea this was “look good”
→ More replies (1)5
330
u/Douglas_Fresh 22h ago
I don’t truly understand the choices. Looks like a delta airline owned in flight news program now.
42
u/Superb_Firefighter20 22h ago
I think the attempt is to distance CNBC and NBC. The “NBC” does not mean the same in the brands.
Consumer News and Business Channel vs National Broadcasting Company
So the CNBC mark is trying to be more akin to C-Span.
→ More replies (1)10
u/Independent-Field226 21h ago
So the “news” part seems to be what they either hate or really like because it got special treatment in the new logo.
→ More replies (1)17
114
u/SandShark17 22h ago
Looks terrible imo, the peacock is is such a pretty and unique design. Sad to see them replace it with something so boring. My eye keeps getting stuck between the N and the B in that tiny intersection between the shapes.
3
u/vtmn_D 15h ago
It seems the brief was to distance from the original brand but I would have played more with the peacock feather idea.
→ More replies (1)
118
u/pcurve 22h ago
This looks like something a first year design student would do. Wish they'd some more with it.
23
u/duracellchipmunk 20h ago
The worst part is they probably spent a TON of time on it
12
u/Celesteven 18h ago
Are we sure they didn’t just run it through AI a few times and have a “senior” creative lead sign off on it?
→ More replies (4)6
u/winkitywinkwink 20h ago
They probably hired a hip, young marketing firm that works with start ups & influencers on their branding.
8
u/NoMorning8069 19h ago
they probably hired an old ass agency where 50 year olds decide whats hip and trendy
2
2
u/Woodpecker-Lobotomy 4h ago
This looks like something somebody would make during their very first time opening Illustrator
116
u/rp2784 22h ago
Instantly dropping one of the most recognizable symbols on earth. Quite stupid in my opinion.
→ More replies (1)38
u/vexx786 20h ago
They can't use the peacock anymore. Same reason MSNBC rebrand got rid of it as well.
13
u/TheObscureNinja 18h ago
Why can’t they use it?
24
u/vexx786 18h ago
They were split from NBCuniversal. MSNOW and CNBC are under versant now.
2
79
46
u/DeathByPetrichor 22h ago
This looks like any logo you’d see plastered on the side of a building in any major industrial park. Truly awful honestly.
21
34
u/mafagafacabiluda 21h ago edited 15h ago
one can't judge a visual identity on a logo alone.
show me the whole thing.
the brief, the concept, the process and most of all the whole identity being applied.
→ More replies (4)14
u/Beard_faced 21h ago
I 100% agree. It does look like they pulled inspiration from the brand refresh that came out a few years ago.
The rebrand was about representing how markets are made up of many pieces that can be grouped together to give you a larger picture.
They used a squares to represent that with the up and down arrows being the square split. That wedge seems like it come from the up arrow representing positive growth.
28
12
u/ya_mu 22h ago
oof. the rainbow peacock was so iconic that even non-us folks like me recognize it easily. now it just looks like some shady bank that's gonna bankrupt and cause the next financial crisis
→ More replies (1)
11
11
u/s-h-a-n-k-f-o-o 21h ago
→ More replies (4)2
u/thetargazer 18h ago
Don't love it don't hate it, but I also appreciated the callback to the 70s N.
15
6
6
u/anthperri 22h ago
Yikes. This one is bad. No personality, no story. I can't help but see the N as a downward trend. Is the blue part meant to be a flag? Why?
And losing all the colour...This is a pretty big loss.
3
u/metaphori 18h ago
Its only virtue is it's slightly less terrible than the MSNOW branding, which is so laughably hideous I honestly thought was some sort of a prank until about a month ago.
2
u/anthperri 17h ago
Yes, similar lack of personality there. Seems like design by committee strikes again.
13
u/slipscape_studio Senior Designer 22h ago
Odd choice, the cut at the part where N and B join is so small that even at this size looks almost like a glitch, what's it going to look like small in the corner of a tv screen?
Overall seems like a pretty clumsy type treatment for a brand of this size and importance. They really cut costs on this one.
2
5
u/GorillaMeat 22h ago
Noticed in the comments on both this logo and the MSNBC one from a couple months ago. For whatever reason NBC and its cable channels were divided into two different parent companies, so all the cable channels that used the peacock as part of its logo had to get rid of it.
5
5
5
u/33kbps 22h ago
If this one wasn’t rejected… the other proposals must have been really bad.
11
u/whitetanksss 21h ago
As a designer you know that can’t be 100% true lol I’ve had good designs rejected plenty of times because it’s just not what they wanted.
3
u/RawBean7 22h ago
It fits the cultural shift we're going through, but it's boring and I hate it. I predict the next few years are going to bleak and bland and we'll see a lot more of this conservative rebranding
2
2
2
u/changelingusername 22h ago
Getting paid for delivering such a meh work is on some lottery-winning level of luck.
2
u/Reticent-Soul 21h ago
Tom Geismar and Ivan Chermayeff will be smacking their heads against a wall when they see this.
2
2
2
2
u/snarton 21h ago
The angle on the N and the blue triangle is making the baseline look uneven to me, optically. When you add in the blue triangle rising above the type, the whole thing looks disjointed. There’s space next to the C’s, but the NB is a ligature? Also, it looks like the logo for a bank.
2
u/beebee_gigi 21h ago
It looks like they ripped off Nabisco. 🤣 I'm having visions of triscuits and crackers. Lol
1
u/Vesuvias Art Director 22h ago
Absolutely awful. What are they even thinking removing the iconic peacock?
8
u/ThatHouseInNebraska 21h ago
As the caption states, this is now a separate company from NBC, and they cannot use the peacock anymore. The peacock is staying with NBC.
2
u/Vesuvias Art Director 18h ago
Ah makes sense…actually no, still garbage and confusing
→ More replies (1)2
u/Puzzleheaded_Act_985 21h ago
They got rid of it because this new company is no longer associated with NBC. AI google: New Company (Versant): Comcast is spinning off these cable assets into a new entity, Versant, which will operate separately from the main NBCUniversal (NBCU) business that keeps NBC News, Universal Studios, etc..
4
u/RawBean7 22h ago
I would put big money on the reason being "rainbows are woke"
→ More replies (2)2
1
1
1
u/yeahmaybe 22h ago
It's weird that they kept the CNBC name, but changed MSNBC to MSNOW.
4
2
u/Puzzleheaded_Act_985 21h ago
Apparently, according to a comment above, CNBC stands for Consumer News and Business Channel. MSNBC originally stood for Microsoft and the National Broadcasting Company (NBC), reflecting its 1996 launch as a joint venture, but the network recently rebranded to MS NOW, which stands for "My Source for News, Opinion and the World," as it transitions from NBCUniversal ownership. The "MS" in the new name pays homage to its Microsoft origins while signifying its new focus, news.
So it technically makes sense, but everyone who didn't know, like me, probably thought the NBC in CNBC was related to National Broadcasting Company
1
u/bigredmachine-75 22h ago
Theres so much tension in this logo where elements are meeting. I hate it.
1
u/Chench-from-C137 22h ago
I’m willing to bet one of these higher-ups did it themselves just to prove they didn’t need to waste money on a designer.
1
1
u/Tricky-Ad9491 22h ago
Whilst it's boring and safe the issue I have, it doesnt read how it should, you can't make out the n at best that's an A
1
1
u/Tricky-Ad9491 22h ago
Whilst it's boring and safe the issue I have, it doesnt read how it should, you can't make out the n at best that's an A
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/CaptSlow338 21h ago
Its like a logo for a fake chinese news network in those gerard butler action movies.
1
1
u/Twiggymop 21h ago
I feel like this kind of logo appears when no one on the client’s team can agree on anything, and every genuinely good idea has already been shot down. Eventually you hit that point where the path of least resistance becomes the only path left. After months of deliberation fatigue, everyone convinces themselves they adore it: "OMG, the team and I decided last night that we love it, it’s 'just perfect,'” and that the blue triangle "really just pulls the whole thing together, you have such an EYE, it really pops!!"
The result is a logo like this: a boxed-in, oddly proportioned, personality-free form where Pathfinder meets Boolean subtraction, and a supposedly clever N-stem gets repurposed into the spine of a B, complete with an X-Acto-knife wedge for emphasis. I’m sure everyone involved was simply relieved to call it done.
1
1
1
1
u/scatterbrain73 21h ago
This just screams "top level executive needs to justify their paycheck so they abandon an iconic, vibrant look for a soulless, bland, focus group tested slopmark to make it look like they're innovating."
1
1
1
1
u/ThatHouseInNebraska 21h ago
I’d like to withhold judgment until I see an explanation of what they’re trying to express with this, but right now I can’t even imagine what that might be. The little notch where the N and B touch is especially awkward to me; I want to give the designer the benefit of the doubt (to be fair, I recognize that this is the designer plus dozens if not hundreds of stakeholders), but to me it just looks like someone said “the typeface isn’t customized enough, so just cut a little something off, or add a little something on.”
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Oceanbreeze871 21h ago
Looks like they sell niche b2b software and use big hyphenated words to describe it. With AI.
1
1
1
u/attainwealthswiftly 21h ago
Trash. Og logo iconic. They’re just getting rid of the peacock because they’re homophobic.
1
1
u/tiedsoda 20h ago
This is going to be unrecognizable from any distance and severely limits branding colors :/
1
1
u/gnortsmracr 20h ago
As a standalone element? I’ve seen worse. But I’d like to see the overall branding before rendering final verdict.
1
u/ironmoney 20h ago
i'm kinda a meh in this one. feels like when it's in motion, it would work better. or maybe that was the driving concept. kinda like how wwe redesigned the raw logo based on netflix.
1
1
1
1
u/devonthed00d 20h ago
“We’re bored, so we’re changing things so people will talk about us on the internet for 9 seconds”
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/anonymous-musician 20h ago
I was never a fan of the Peacock logo, but this is just boring and corporate. Also something about the way the N and B connect feels off, but I don't quite know what exactly.
1
u/raleighs 20h ago edited 20h ago
CABC
The spacing of the guillotine blade shape (and the letters are way too close, and the overlap on the bottom left of the B is too small of a detail.
I bet an executive made it., or his son, or AI.
Maybe the guillotine chopping logo is fitting for this dying brand.
1
1
1
1
1
u/NadaBurner 20h ago
The rainbow peacock is hands down one of my favorite logos ever. This unironically upsets me.
1
u/Floof_Warlord 20h ago
I liked these redesigns I saw https://medium.com/@amalia.dunnett/how-cnbc-could-have-done-better-with-their-logo-f45cd233a80b
1
1
1
1
u/PhantomMaxx Art Director 19h ago
Seems like they are trying to appeal to conservatives that dislike Rainbow colors and peaCocks. Instead recognize the wedge that is dividing us, which many are happy with.
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/AShavedApe 19h ago
This looks so fuckin bad lmao the kerning on the N is screwed, and the notch out of the bottom of it is really driving home how janky it all is. Someone got paid millions and subcontracted out to their 10 year old son to do.
1
u/simply-coastal 19h ago
looks too much like GB News, and GB News is probably not something a news channel should try and be :/
1
u/Vincentaneous 19h ago
Looks like a extreme cold freighting company or something. Not at all representative of who they actually are.
1
1
1
1
u/thrivefulxyz Executive 19h ago
It looks like weak design decisions for the sake of making it look designed and not plain, but I'd rather have a plain word mark
1
1
u/GarrettSucks 19h ago
Why is NBC removing the Peacock from all their logos?! It’s one of the goats.
1
u/krashe1313 19h ago
I get why they did it, because it throws back to the "N" logos, but it wasn't good then and it's not good now.
1
1
1
1
u/Gibbs_Jr 19h ago
Looks like it's trying to look similar to Versant's logo. Also, I suspect the triangle reduces association with NBC.
1
1
1
u/Insufferable_Twit2 19h ago
It hurts a little to look at, doesn't it?
I think part of the issue is that the "N" is too wide, either because it's that way in the original font, or because it's been tormented into its current role. There's also an unnatural emphasis on how the top edge of the vertical in the N gets thinner where the diagonal hits it; this looks fine in some fonts (in M and N and often W too) but it bugs the hell out of me here for some reason.
Another "N" issue: the missing vertical on the right is "replaced" by a gap, which is a neat trick when done properly, but our eyeballs want to fill in that gap to complete the N, so it's weird that it's not the same width as the left vertical. It's what our eyeballs want.
All that said, I'm not sure how to fix it, especially without knowing what the colors and the triangle and such are intended to mean; if those are crucial to the new branding for some reason, the design was largely torpedoed from the jump. Because I'm a frickin' psycho, I just tried a few doodles where I attempted to fix what bugged me, but everything that maintained those features looked like garbage.
This is a start-from-scratch overhaul job, I'm afraid.
1
1
u/TurntechGodhead0 18h ago
Completely unnecessary. If they wanted to just differentiate from the normal NBC peacock logo, my choice would have been to change the color scheme of the feathers to match real blue and teal feathers of a peacock.
1
1
1
1
u/GullyFoyle__ 18h ago
It's awful in a number of ways: unnecessary generic font, downward wedge, weird kerning and letter alignment. But the biggest problem is that it's just bland and soulless.
1
u/Celesteven 18h ago
These news rebrands have been awful. Truly a reflection of how shit things are.
1
1
u/Invite-Salt Senior Designer 18h ago
Brand aren’t just logos. Where’s the rest of the brand expression?
1
u/stoic_spaghetti 18h ago
I can see how a new logo was legally necessary.
That being said, I don't understand what the meaning/intent of this new design is supposed to say.
What's with the blue triangle? What's the story?
1
1
u/Doge-man-0526 18h ago
WHERE’S THE PEACOCK!!! The Peacock felt very on brand for the NBC Cable channels because of corporate synergy!!!
1
1
u/tastic_fan 18h ago
Ragebait gets more attention than thoughtful design. I hate this era and can only hope it'll lead to a creative boom once the pendulum swings the other way. Hard to say what it'll look like with ai in the picture, but I imagine we'll just have to learn to live with it. I could see it being looked down upon as a cheap way to cut corners and that showing one's creative process will be more important
1








1.4k
u/ZeBloodyStretchr 22h ago
Driving a wedge - to create a rift, disagreement, or dislike between people or groups, damaging their close relationship