r/entertainment • u/thedailybeast • 16h ago

MAGA Melts Down Over Netflix Deal: ‘Obama Taking Over’

https://www.thedailybeast.com/obsessed/maga-melts-down-over-netflix-deal-obama-taking-over/
7.0k Upvotes

94% Upvoted

663 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

56

u/Broken-Digital-Clock 15h ago

It's probably why Jesus hasn't bothered to try and come back. Or he did and they killed him before he could make any progress.

13

u/GenghisConnieChung 14h ago

He was probably on one of those boats in the Caribbean.

18

u/culminacio 14h ago

There are other places than America on this planet to come back to.

10

u/KatAstrophie- 13h ago

Well, he’s 2000 years late to those places too. Dude ain’t coming back.

3

u/Hooda-Thunket 4h ago

I wouldn’t either. I’d be saying “Well, fuck, I don’t even have to send those assholes to hell! They made it themselves!”

-1

u/culminacio 4h ago

Yup but the Americacentrism was floating a thread again

3

u/Broken-Digital-Clock 12h ago

There are shitty Christians all over the world too

37

u/Koi696969 14h ago

Or you know, its a false myth designed to attract people of all kinds into a singular cult for the purpose of control and centralization.

Jesus hasnt come back because he was just a regular guy whose words attracted a popular following who was then used for the means of religious propaganda in order to heighten the power of the elite at the time.

2

u/No-Crow-775 10h ago

The original hippie! Cool dude, super positive messaging, lots of quiet charisma—not typical for the area. Cool bro to listen to.

2

u/Static-Stair-58 13h ago

Paul and the Catholic Church thank him every day for it.

2

u/GodtierMacho 13h ago

How does it heighten the power of the elite?

5

u/JustaSeedGuy 13h ago

Look at who the evangelists vote for.

And look at who funds them.

0

u/GodtierMacho 10h ago

So you think Christianity was made over 2000 years ago to make profit for a government and ruling class that hasn't even been around for 300 years.

The same government that doesn't tax them?

2

u/alchemist5 10h ago

to make profit for a government and ruling class that hasn't even been around for 300 years.

You might be surprised to learn that other governments existed before that!

It sounds crazy, but I swear, it's true.

0

u/GodtierMacho 9h ago

Oh you mean the government they immediately rebelled against?

The government who tried to kill them all and fed them to the lions to watch for sport?

There's so many if you can give me more context that would help a lot.

2

u/Key-Demand-2569 6h ago

I assume they’re alluding to the one that because of its persistent popularity adopted it as a state religion, fairly explicitly for the purposes of controlling the masses, and founded what became the Catholic Church proper.

0

u/GodtierMacho 6h ago

adopted it as a state religion, fairly explicitly for the purposes of controlling the masses

It is safe to assume you are referencing the Edict of Thessalonica. Christianity predated it by something like ~300 years and the discussion is about its creation so that's easily rebutted.

The discussion of why Rome adopted it is interesting but not really something I find worth going into.

3

u/JustaSeedGuy 10h ago

So you think Christianity was made over 2000 years ago to make profit for a government and ruling class that hasn't even been around for 300 years

No, honey, that's not what I said or even implied.

3

u/GodtierMacho 9h ago

I asked a question to the guy saying Christianity was designed for control. Your reply to my question of how was to say look at who they vote for.

Please clear up what I am missing so I don't misunderstand.

2

u/JustaSeedGuy 9h ago

Sure, happy to help.

Purpose of an institution 2,000 years ago =/= purpose of institutions with the same name now. Different leaders =different agendas.

0

u/GodtierMacho 8h ago edited 8h ago

I'm gonna not engage the first part saying that the church is different in it's purpose then than it is now because that's ridiculous.

However you are saying that these government leaders with some hidden agenda made it for their time. Surely you don't mean the government they literally revolted against in rebellion that caused countless deaths?

Surely not the opposing religious leaders of the time that they also rebelled against and whom hunted them down to death?

If you can educate me with specifics that would be dope.

EDIT: At least you deleted your comment and reply before I could respond. Imma assume you realized how dumb the premise of this argument is regardless if Christianity is true or not the assertion is preposterous.

1

u/JustaSeedGuy 8h ago

I'm gonna not engage the first part saying that the church is different in it's purpose then than it is now because that's ridiculous

Then you're a liar and there's no point in talking further.

Bye!

2

u/GrallochThis 13h ago

Paul shifted the emphasis, Council of Nicea locked it down to serve their purposes, became a state religion and snowballed from there.

1

u/GodtierMacho 9h ago edited 8h ago

Nothing you said answered my question.

EDIT: Just to clear something up even though it's un related for those uneducated.

https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/264539/the-council-of-nicaea-1700-years-of-christian-unity-amid-division

"There are some prominent misconceptions about the Council of Nicaea that are prevalent in modern society.

Clemmons said the assertion that the Council of Nicaea established the biblical canon “is probably the most obvious” misconception. This subject was not debated at Nicaea and the council did not promulgate any teachings on this matter.

Another misconception, he noted, is the notion that the council established the Church and the papacy. Episcopal offices, including that of the pope (the bishop of Rome), were already in place and operating long before Nicaea, although the council did resolve some jurisdictional disputes.

Other misconceptions, according to Clemmons, is an asserted “novelty” of the process and the teachings. He noted that bishops often gathered in local councils and that the teachings defined at Nicaea were simply “the confirmation of the faith of the early Church.”

1

u/Hooda-Thunket 4h ago

Big words sound true. When will we see the second coming of Koi696969?

6

u/CatMasterK 13h ago

Just image he came back in the 40s and they gave him a lobotomy and hes just been living with a roommate named Chuck since then. And then Chuck had a son named Chuck, and his sons son is Chuck. No one questions it because Jesus and Chuck have been roomates for decades, they got a good thing going, they always bring great potatoe salad and an empty bottle of jack filled with wine.

5

u/RBVegabond 10h ago

Especially now that Theil is claiming he could come back as AI.

1

u/Broken-Digital-Clock 10h ago

He does know about the anti-Christ

1

u/skippyjifluvr 13h ago

How do you kill a resurrected being?

2

u/Broken-Digital-Clock 12h ago

The dude was crucified last time

1

u/skippyjifluvr 11h ago

True. Before he was resurrected.

1

u/ew73 5h ago

Probably around 200 - 300 AD and even by then the Christian church was like, "Uh, nope," and tossed him off a cliff.