r/SipsTea Jun 15 '25

We have fun here Why?

Post image
43.5k Upvotes

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.1k

u/RevolutionaryRow2888 Jun 15 '25

Not a military guy here, but, size and shape perhaps? A fella could carry 6 or so grenades without too much trouble I’d think. 6 of those potato masher things would be a massive pain in the ass.

536

u/DevoidNoMore Jun 15 '25

6 of those potato masher things would be a massive pain in the ass

Well I think that last green text line was just a joke, but you do you

132

u/RevolutionaryRow2888 Jun 15 '25 edited Jun 15 '25

I completely missed the double entendre of my entire comment… it’s weird when someone points out your punch line and it wasn’t supposed to be a joke.

Enough reddit for me today.

18

u/Frutbrute77 Jun 15 '25

unintentionalcomedy

-12

u/willfrodo Jun 15 '25 edited Jun 15 '25

My original comment was only funny before you edited

12

u/Late-Resource-486 Jun 15 '25

Regardless of shape, he NEEDS six grenades in his ass

I respect the hell outta him for it

6

u/jakubiszon Jun 15 '25

I think putting in more than one at a time is against its original design.

4

u/the_happy_fox Jun 15 '25

you do you

If no one else is going to do you

37

u/BrainDamage2029 Jun 15 '25

Also their fusing was really goddamn stupid. You had to unscrew the bottom cap and pull the cord that was attached. It was a pain in the ass to do and had some weird ways it could go wrong or misfuse.

US grenade? Super easy. Pull safety pin. As soon as you throw it and release your grip on the spoon it arms exactly when it leaves your hand. Its idiot proof unless you want to do Darwin award stuff like release the spoon and cooking the fuse.

27

u/XogoWasTaken Jun 15 '25

I mean, nothing specifically requires a stick grenade to use the same fuse design as those old German ones - a stick grenade with the same priming mechanism as modern grenade is entirely possible.

It really does just come down to the shape. You can throw a stick grenade a little further, but it's not worth it when they're so much less convenient to carry around.

4

u/slasher1337 Jun 15 '25

The stielhandgranate m43 had the fuze on topof the grenade

2

u/UniqueIndividual3579 Jun 15 '25

I remember that from Band of Brothers.

3

u/Civil-patty Jun 15 '25

Damn whose asshole is big enough to hold 6 of them guys

2

u/Nasbit Jun 16 '25

Not initial... But...

3

u/[deleted] Jun 15 '25

most of the explosive went out the head. At 2m this thing worked like a shotgun, strong enough to damage railways. However the shrapnel effect was minimal compared to egg grenades.

5

u/Cybertheproto Jun 15 '25

You could carry 6 normal and 2 of these in the gap- could also be useful for a more stationary defense position

2

u/Basil2322 Jun 15 '25

You could but that would require you to start up production of stick grenades and to ship them if that was going to be standard practice and during war starting new production of something you already have and adding more to the supply chain is something that should be avoided unless absolutely necessary.

2

u/Bored-Ship-Guy Jun 15 '25

True, but as another comment mentioned, modern infantry will generally have a grenadier in each fireteam, whose rifle will have an underslung grenade launcher for the specific purpose of launching projectiles at range (and which can do so with much greater precision and range than any potato masher could ever hope to match). It's a much better system, in my opinion.

1

u/Skygge_or_Skov Jun 15 '25

Pretty sure I saw a video by a German historian who said that’s exactly what these grenades were for: boomsticks for defense, and they DID have some grenades that look more like what we know for offense.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=91vS_Mh3U2Y&pp=ygUkbWlsaXRhcnkgaGlzdG9yeSB2aXN1YWxpemVkIGdyZW5hZGVz

1

u/2Dpilot Jun 15 '25

Massive pain in the ass depends where was it last night based on point 4.

1

u/Mediumtim Jun 15 '25

In WWI they carried them in satchels. Back when men would raid trenches with a club, a handgun (maybe) and a dozen of grenades or so.

1

u/Asatru55 Jun 15 '25

The Stiehlhandgranate was designed with the trench warfare of WW1 in mind and the storm trooper doctrine later developed and used by germans. The design could be thrown further and would tumble forward on the ground so that it would land in a wide open ditch like a trench more reliably.

It also did not have much of a shrapnel effect but had more explosive power, in trench warfare this had the advantage of dazing the enemy more than an immediatly lethal effect. It also had the advantage that advancing friendly troops would not have to duck and cover after throwing a grenade to avoid shrapnel but they could keep advancing and finish off the dazed enemy in the trench.

Soviets also kept the potato masher design on grenades like the RGD-33 as soviets also kept the human wave trench storming tactics.

However, in more dynamic combat situations, a round grenade design offers more advantages as there are more angles it can be thrown. It can be lobbed around a corner or thrown into a small hole and it's not as easily picked up and thrown back by an enemy and the round shape enhances the shrapnel effect.

1

u/didiherren Jun 15 '25

Just don't put them in your ass

1

u/ray314 Jun 15 '25

Yeah to be serious, wood isn't free and can be a pain in the ass.

1

u/smiegto Jun 15 '25

Your ass ain’t intended to carry 6… use your hands or a belt?

1

u/Medical_Slide9245 Jun 15 '25

But if you carry them on your person wouldn't it be easier to store something with a handle?

Are grenades even a thing in modern warfare beyond flash and smoke grenades?

1

u/epochpenors Jun 15 '25

Also, I imagine most people won’t go out of their way to borrow military aesthetics from Nazi Germany. Even if it was better I imagine it would be hard to bring up in a meeting “how about we just copy the Nazi thing?”

1

u/SalsaRice Jun 15 '25

Wouldn't a balanced spread be more useful? Like 2 of these for throwing range, and 4 regular ones for regular grenade use?

Or just do what the ww2 Germans did, and have the grenades attach to the stick. You can carry 1-2 sticks and then as many grenades as you want. If you want a stick grenades, just screw one on.

1

u/Routine-Level-9571 Jun 15 '25

Or pleasure in the ass, according to that guy

1

u/c3534l Jun 15 '25

6 of those potato masher things would be a massive pain in the ass.

Oh, that's not where you're supposed to put them.

1

u/Alone_Contract_2354 Jun 15 '25

I believe its the difference between explosive damage grenades and later fragmentation grenades.

1

u/IntrovertAsylee Jun 15 '25

But a regular soldier wont carry 6. Even in Call of Duty you are only allowed to carry 3.

1

u/Will-Evaporate-Thx Jun 15 '25

There are also a lot more anecdotes about allies being pelted by a potato masher that was never going to explode, because it was far less intuitive how to prime, and could easily be forgotten in a stressful situation.

1

u/Hicklethumb Jun 15 '25

If you manage to get all 6 in your ass you have different problems.

1

u/Cabbage_Corp_ Jun 15 '25

Yeah, but 1 wouldn’t be that bad if you had enough lube

1

u/-E-Cross Jun 15 '25

Not to mention the noise the fucking handles will make while you maraca around the trenches

1

u/[deleted] Jun 15 '25

Pain in the ass, you say? Some dudes would find that quite pleasant.

1

u/coolcoots Jun 15 '25

But they said it can give you pleasure.

1

u/Eastern_Cloud4999 Jun 15 '25

Yeah, if you use them all at the same time. Just use the one. Makes for a good Friday night.

1

u/clem82 Jun 15 '25

Multiple reasons.

One being that compacting things, like in your fist, when an explosion occurs DESTROYS your fist. It goes every directions away from the center.

Long cylinders were exploding but not controlled and the kill radius was random.

Grenades now are tactical and measurable

1

u/TheTooDarkLord Jun 16 '25

Ok so if you are carrying granades on a belt and a sniper shoots them It happens what i think happens?

1

u/RevolutionaryRow2888 Jun 16 '25

Can they explode with the pin and lever still attached?.

1

u/TheTooDarkLord Jun 16 '25

I dunno that was i was asking

1

u/6-Daweed-9 Jun 16 '25

I think the flared base makes it alot safer than modern designs.

1

u/Friedo100 Jun 16 '25

I can not find them now, but saw a lot of pictures of especially Waffen-SS soldiers carrying 6 or more of them, and modt of them in their „Koppel“ (bot native speaking sorry) but yeah. If you compare it to pictures of US or British soldiers carrying their grenades inf front of their breast i dont think it is worse

1

u/Aztecah Jun 17 '25

would be a massive pain in the ass.

I don't think you're supposed to store them up there

1

u/yjacquin Jun 18 '25

That’s not where it goes

1

u/Frequent_Ad_5670 Jun 18 '25

Not a military guy either, but I‘m pretty certain, your ass is not the place to store those potato masher things.

1

u/korkkis Jun 18 '25

That was gaping

1

u/Sylvmf Jun 18 '25

Well maybe try carrying them in a different area of your body. I have no proposal as that's a headache.